Summary

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has begun administering polygraph tests to employees in an effort to identify individuals leaking information about immigration operations.

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and border czar Tom Homan have blamed recent leaks for lower-than-expected ICE arrest numbers.

Noem stated that two leakers had been identified and would be prosecuted, though it’s unclear if polygraphs were used.

While DHS has used polygraphs before for hiring screenings, they are now being used to question employees about leaks of classified or sensitive law enforcement information.

      • Skua
        link
        fedilink
        102 months ago

        You could honestly just ask the ghost via the oiuja board and it would be roughly as meaningful as a polygraph

  • @wwb4itcgas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 months ago

    That might have made more sense if polygraph testing actually performed better than a dice roll. The US Congress Office of Technology Assessment and the National Academy of Sciences could’ve told DHS that, but I guess they didn’t think to ask.

    Or think in general.

  • magnetosphere
    link
    fedilink
    882 months ago

    Polygraph tests are so unreliable, they’re not even admissible in court.

    Not exactly a rock solid case if someone who’s fired decides to sue - which I hope happens frequently.

    • vortic
      link
      fedilink
      182 months ago

      It’s in their contract that the results of a polygraph are grounds for dismissal alone. They have no grounds to sue.

      • magnetosphere
        link
        fedilink
        152 months ago

        Ah. Thank you. I didn’t know that.

        That’s a really shitty contract.

    • @adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      342 months ago

      they’re “reliable enough” for their intended purpose here: fire people who aren’t “in line”.

      • magnetosphere
        link
        fedilink
        232 months ago

        Yeah, but the DHS is taking a massive risk each time they fire someone because of a polygraph. Without other evidence, they will have no legal defense if sued.

    • Lexam
      link
      fedilink
      62 months ago

      Or say whatever you want since polygraphs are horse shit.

  • @A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    382 months ago

    Your regular reminder that polygraphs are junk science that arent admissible in court.

    You’d be just as successful finding the truth by hiring a phrenologist to study the bumps of peoples heads.

    • @rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I had a co-worker who managed to score himself a pretty decent aerospace job. He was a damn good coder, college graduate, No debt no drug use whatsoever, nicest guy in the world. This one time a baby mouse got stuck in a recycling can by his desk. He gave it water put a little piece of Rice Krispie treat and with it so it had something to eat. The mouse took a bite of the rice krispie treat and kealed over dead. He sobbed about that for the whole day and was mopey for the rest of the week.

      Anyway he passed all the practical exams with flying colors. They’ve gone through months of investigation, and he was fine. Finally came time for the polygraph. He went for the poly and found some time later that it was not good. They scheduled him back for another poly. Some number of days or weeks later it came back as “not good”.

      I’m like dude, what’s happening when you’re going in there? Are they asking you complicated morality questions or something? Basically, it came down to about halfway through the test, he would just start freaking out that he wasn’t going to pass it and get nervous and upset. The second time he actually cried a little bit.

      He never did get that job. But I can assure you that if he had he would have gone to his grave with any secrets that ever would have come out of there.

  • @civil_drive@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 months ago

    Have they stopped to consider that they maybe are just super incompetent idiots? Who am I kidding, they lack the intelligence for introspection and are incapable of coming to rational conclusions.

  • greenfire
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 months ago

    Is the current US regime actually fascist, or is it just some kind of nausea-inducing Keystone Kops reality TV farce doomed to total failure & obscurity?

    • The Quuuuuill
      link
      fedilink
      English
      372 months ago

      bruh. us prisons employ multiple “pacification” techniques that draw from torture tricks. the intelligence community that’s willing to work with musk is absolutely a modern gestapo or okrana

  • @Doctor_Satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    43
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If you’re going to rely on pseudo-scoentific bullshit, you might as well bring in some palm readers and voodoo priests instead. At least that’ll be entertaining.

    EDIT - Just want to add this - Never, under any circumstances, should you take a polygraph test. If you are a suspect (legally or otherwise), they will not use the results to exonerate you. If they suspect you did it, but the polygraph doesn’t detect any deception, they will throw out the results as “unreadable” and pursue other means of investigating you. But if the results detect deception, they will treat it like the fucking Oracle at Delphi.

    • Dr. Moose
      link
      fedilink
      English
      222 months ago

      Seriously american obsession with this snake oil bullshit is staggering. It never worked in any reasonable extent and how could it?

      The idea of detecting lying by measuring “heart rate and co” is plainly idiotic and anyone who’s part of this should be shamed into obscurity.