Donald Trump just imposed a 25 percent tariff on virtually all goods produced by America’s two largest trading partners — Canada and Mexico. He simultaneously established a 20 percent across-the-board tariff on Chinese goods.

As a result, America’s average tariff level is now higher than at any time since the 1940s.

Meanwhile, China and Canada immediately retaliated against Trump’s duties, with the former imposing a 15 percent tariff on American agricultural products and the latter putting a 25 percent tariff on $30 billion of US goods. Mexico has vowed to mount retaliatory tariffs of its own.

This trade war could have far-reaching consequences. Trump’s tariffs have already triggered a stock market sell-off and cooling of manufacturing activity. And economists have estimated that the trade policy will cost the typical US household more than $1,200 a year, as the prices of myriad goods rise.

All this raises the question: Why has the US president chosen to upend trade relations on the North American continent? The stakes of this question are high, since it could determine how long Trump’s massive tariffs remain in effect. Unfortunately, the president himself does not seem to know the answer.

In recent weeks, Trump has provided five different — and contradictory — justifications for his tariffs on Mexico and Canada…

…more in the article.

  • Leraje
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 month ago

    Techbro led gvmt - move fast, break stuff. Chaos leads to opportunity to profit, by which I mean him and his class to profit.

  • @Floon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 month ago

    The chaos is the point: make nothing normal, make nothing certain, and he can be free to do anything.

  • @ubergeek@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    221 month ago

    He keeps claiming they are “abusing us”, but… Like, why did he make that deal then last time he was in office?

    • socialjusticewizard
      link
      fedilink
      English
      951 month ago

      yup. it’s successfully costing america its allies.

      It’s not inappropriate though. I’ve been saying for years Canada should not be so closely allied with such a fickle country.

  • Queen HawlSera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 month ago

    Because at his age it was easier than getting penis-enlarging surgery.

  • @Yojimbo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    381 month ago

    Cuz he is a puppet, a Russian asset and generally not an intelligent person nor a good businessman.

    • @ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 month ago

      Yep, he has no political will of his own, he’s a fucking geriatric reality TV host, he has no energy left, he’s being paraded around to push the talking points of people like Stephen Miller and Putin. He gives zero shits and it shows. He barely bothers trying to articulate his reasoning for anything, and he still has a rabid following of zealots who have turned off all thought and will just invent his justifications for him.

  • @sasquatch7704@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I know why he did it. Because that’s what his best best friend from Kremlin said and his two last working brain cells are in vacation playing golf.

    He probably doesn’t understand that if US stops all trading, will become just a bigger North Korea with nukes.

    • @Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      Yeah. Dude knows exactly why he’s weakening America as much and on every front as possible, it’s just he can’t exactly say the truth and isn’t smart enough to effectively lie about it.

    • @sunfur82@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 month ago

      He has to be. I can’t think of any other reason why he’d be trying to hard to antagonize and disrespect long-time allies, while praising Russia. He then made that ridiculous statement that Ukraine started the war, when Russia was the one who invaded them, and also said that Zelensky should be ‘nicer’ to Putin. But Putin, who ordered the attack that caused who knows how many deaths, shouldn’t be ‘nicer’?

      There was also the first term, where Trump fired the FBI director over an investigation into Russia, and then told Russia that he fired ‘that nut job’. What kind of message does that send to their own people? Not just that he fired the director, but that he bragged about it to the people he was investigating.

      I honestly think most of the GOP knows, but they’re too embarrassed to admit it. Or maybe it’s just pride, they think it’s beneath them to be held accountable to anyone.

  • Rogue Satellite
    link
    fedilink
    English
    28
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I never liked that many seem to be of the idea that Trump is an absolute buffoon who doesn’t know what he is doing. He and his goons are not headless chickens. They are not stupid, and know incredibly well what they are doing and why.

    You don’t get to win an election twice if you’re as much of an idiot as most make him out to be. If we keep underestimating our ‘opposition’, we will continue to be defeated.

    See this article for more: https://unherd.com/2025/02/why-trumps-tariffs-are-a-masterplan/

    TLDR:

    In this article, Yanis Varoufakis analyzes Donald Trump’s economic strategy, arguing that it is more sophisticated than his critics assume. Trump’s focus on tariffs is part of a broader plan to reshape the global economic order, which Varoufakis describes as an “anti-Nixon Shock.” Trump believes the U.S. has been exploited due to the dollar’s role as the global reserve currency, which he sees as a burden rather than a privilege. He aims to weaken the dollar to boost U.S. manufacturing and reduce trade deficits, while maintaining its reserve status to fund U.S. deficits and military power.

    Trump’s plan involves using tariffs to pressure foreign central banks to lower interest rates, thereby depreciating their currencies relative to the dollar. This would offset the price increases caused by tariffs on U.S. consumers. The second phase of his strategy involves bilateral negotiations with key countries, leveraging tariffs and security threats to force them to appreciate their currencies and make concessions, such as buying more U.S. goods or relocating manufacturing to the U.S.

    Varoufakis acknowledges the risks, including potential domestic backlash from Wall Street and the possibility of foreign countries, particularly China, creating an alternative financial system. However, he argues that Trump’s plan is coherent and should not be underestimated, even if it diverges sharply from traditional economic thinking.

    • @goatbeard@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      I’m shocked that more people don’t consider a change in perspective on global economics. It’s been clear for a long time that the existing system is unsustainable.

      • @rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        Because it’s like spending lots of money paying for gas to drive your car, and you don’t like that, so you take a steaming hot dump in your gas tank, you know, “as a change in perspective”.

        Surprise, you won’t save anything on gas, and your car runs like shit now too.

    • @KeenFlame@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      It is abundantly clear that he is, and that they are. Stop giving credit to people that are in front of you live creating lies on the spot about what they just said, because in their head they have permission to gaslight people into elevating them to godhood? This is a dangerous extreme take, get your glasses on.

    • @ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I don’t doubt the reputation of the writer or his general knowledge of economics…

      But this is coping. The Trump administration is trying to wave their hands around and create a giant fuss for people like us and this writer to speculate on and create debates and panels to think about… while he and his people simply walk out of the white house with the treasury and all the inside investment opportunities they will ever want.

      He’s just making chaos, plain and simple. These ideas about his master plan to disrupt the world’s reliance on the US dollar? Distraction and coping.

      I agree this administration is more clever than we give them credit for, but any house thief can step up their game and pull of a heist when they set their mind to it, it’s not some kind of magic skill. If anything, I think it’s harmful to assume Trump is at all smart or has a plan because this makes a lot more assumptions than the most simple answer which is almost always the correct determination. He is making a mess because his ONLY plan is to make you think he has a plan. He does this with literally everything he says or announces, why would anyone think this is different? This is EXACTLY the fucking delusion I was railing against in another comment. There is no plan. Nobody is coming. Stop thinking others are smarter than you or have a backup plan.

      My evidence? We’ve done all this fucking before, this is part 2 of a failure of a presidency. He didn’t change the world before, he won’t here. (Other than diminishing the US role in geopolitics so Russia can take center stage, all he really wants right now)

    • @Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Dude that makes no sense at all. He wants to depreciate the dollar by putting on tariffs, an action you yourself admit depreciates all OTHER currencies, thereby increasing the value of the dollar?

      Then after that he’ll “negotiate” to have the other countries to appreciate their currencies? By buying US goods and companies?? Both of those things appreciate the US dollar. China has been selling their goods to the US (something which should appreciate their currency) without appreciating their currency by buying property and companies in the US so they never have to use the US dollar to buy their own currency. This increases the value of the dollar while decreasing demands for the Chinese currency. This has been widely seen as unfair currency manipulation by China.

      Things that increase demand for US dollars such as buying US goods and investing in the US APPRECIATE the value of of the US dollar. I haven’t read the article yet, but I hope your summary is incorrect, because Varoufakis is generally a very intelligent left wing thinker and I would be surprised to see this kind of gaffe in basic economics.

      Edit: here is a link to the article since the one above didn’t work for me.

      https://www.yanisvaroufakis.eu/2025/02/21/donald-trumps-economic-masterplan-unherd/

      While tariffs would work against Trump’s plan (by deppreciating foreign currencies) they give Trump revenue he can spend with congressional approval. Then for the countries that make a deal he’ll either force them to appreciate their currencies by swapping US dollars for their own currency (to depreciate the dollar), OR make them buy very long term US bonds (stabilizing the US debt markets) and buying US weapons (diluting the cost of US military R&D). Trump hopes this lets him depreciate the dollar while keeping it as a reserve currency (having his cake and eating it too).

    • @rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 month ago

      Trump’s plan involves using tariffs to pressure foreign central banks to lower interest rates, thereby depreciating their currencies relative to the dollar. This would offset the price increases caused by tariffs on U.S. consumers.

      Nothing about this string of connections makes any sense. Why would they lower interest rates, why would their currency depreciate?

      Other countries are just going to form trade partnerships with each other and avoid the US. There will be a new strengthening global economy that skips the US entirely.

      It’s Brexit all over again, but instead of the UK suffering from leaving the EU, it’s the US suffering from leaving the global economy. At some point the US will have to come crawling back just for deals worse than it had in the first place.

      Varoufakis’ reasoning is fully consistent with the Trump/Musk world of drug-induced delusion.

    • @FeatherConstrictor@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 month ago

      The thing is, I don’t doubt there is an actual reason why these plans have some more intelligent purpose behind them; I doubt that Trump is the one thinking of this. I’m of the belief that Trump has a bunch of yes men around him that are smart and able to coerce him to do these things through careful manipulation strategies and feeding into his ego.

      • @WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        201 month ago

        The project 2025 people already had every executive order and move lined up ready for him. No understanding required .

    • @Jollyllama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 month ago

      That’s definitely someone’s opinion of what they are doing. I think he’s fallen victim to looking really hard for a plausible reason for emotional behavior. Trump and his admin seem more hell bent on gaining leverage in order to increase greatness and power over others and eventually profit. They aren’t looking to save or kill the dollar or reset the economy. In my opinion as an uneducated person they want to deregulate then tank the markets to create an environment where the wealthiest will buy up the discounted assets and profit when the economy swings back. Nothing more than a shortsighted opportunity to consolidate power and wealth, the same way he is trying to consolidate power into the executive branch.

  • yeehaw
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 month ago

    Am I the only one surprised at how low the cost per household could be? I keep thinking it should be quite a bit higher.

    • @Someone@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      Maybe they’re factoring in all the job losses, if someone can’t afford to buy food at all they won’t be paying any tariffs.

  • @notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    811 month ago

    All this raises the question: Why has the US president chosen to upend trade relations on the North American continent?

    It’s because the trade agreement trump’s unhappy with was made by a raging moron.

      • @Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        That casinos well known to be money laundering for the Russians so it’s intentional, him not paying g contracters was where he had his scams

      • @grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 month ago

        The secret ingredient is crime. The casinos were fronts for money laundering and “failed” on purpose as part of the scam.

    • @lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 month ago

      It’s also because the rest of the people in charge (mainly Republicans) aren’t doing anything to stop them. It also has to do with Americans being largely stupid.

      Most republicans aren’t going to do anything because if they go against Trump … Trump will skewer them and they’ll lose their seat because their voters are stupid too.

    • @thejml@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      691 month ago

      For everyone else following along, the USMCA that was put in place after Trump renegotiated NAFTA in his first term… was made by Trump. So he’s unhappy with his own legacy. Which seems on brand for him, tbh.

      • @ryper@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 month ago

        Part of the agreement allows for a review next year and his complaints could have been addressed them, but apparently negotiated such a lousy deal he can’t wait that long.

        • @SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          181 month ago

          They are tanking markets for both the fire sale bargains and to hurt the poor more, so they can direct the resulting anger towards projects like territorial expansion and government privatization.

          • YonderEpochs
            link
            fedilink
            English
            121 month ago

            Thank you. Stated goals and actual goals for these people are always entirely independent, if they align it’s just coincidence / convenience. People need to stop being so credible and debating this shit on its stated terms, fascists don’t debate in good faith.

  • @lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 month ago

    The guy who said he’d build a wall & Mexico would pay for it doesn’t know why he started a trade war?

    That’s a shock.