AI Summary:

  • Utah is poised to ban fluoride in public water systems, pending the governor’s signature.
  • The bill prohibits adding fluoride to public water and repeals previous related laws.
  • Federal health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has criticized fluoride, influencing the bill.
  • Studies on fluoride’s impact on children’s IQ have mixed results, with some showing negative effects and others showing no harm.
  • Major public health groups support fluoridation for dental health benefits.
  • The anti-fluoridation movement has gained popularity post-Covid-19.
  • Similar legislation is proposed in Florida, emphasizing the importance of consent in public health measures.
  • @thingAmaBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    112 months ago

    When I was younger, I was confused as to why fluoride was in water, since we would receive regular fluoride tablets in grade school. I’m sure not every school does that…

  • Ghostalmedia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Up next in Utah, higher dental insurance premiums, copays, and deductibles.

    • wildncrazyguy138
      link
      fedilink
      872 months ago

      This is the way. The idiots have been coddled for generations. They need to have the experience of their teeth rotting out for themselves.

      • @cybersin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        352 months ago

        And what about the other 49% they dragged down with them? You’ve also just made everyone’s dental insurance 10x more expensive. Thanks!

        • @indomara@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 months ago

          For anyone in a state without fluoridated water, you can get fluoride drops to put in your/your children’s water.

          • @howrar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            32 months ago

            Why not just brush their teeth? I’m pretty sure fluoridated toothpaste is much easier to come by than fluoride drops.

            • Bahnd Rollard
              link
              fedilink
              32 months ago

              Because adding fluoride to tap water provides measurable benifits regardless of socioeconomic status.

              In addition, other countries where municpal water is not as developed, they will add fluoride to salts and other consumer products.

                • Bahnd Rollard
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -2
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Because your logic is flawed coming to that question. It insinuates that one is needed over the other. This is not a fair comparison because toothpaste and fluoride suppliments are purchased and flouridated tap water costs almost nothing to consumers of municipal water. All sources must be taken into account for public health programs like this.

          • @prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            32 months ago

            I grew up with well water and we didn’t have naturally occurring water.

            Our doctor prescribed us a chewable tablet we took every night after dinner.

            Didn’t get my first, and only, cavity until I was 35.

            My ex-wife who grew up with me had a dad who was “they’re putting gay vaccines in our fluoride to turn our cavities to queers” type and they didn’t …. Cavity city.

  • @indomara@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    422 months ago

    Want to see what happens when you do this?

    https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/children-youth/childrens-headline-indicators/contents/indicator-7

    Notice the two states with the highest rates of dental decay are Queensland and Northern Territory?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_fluoridation_in_Australia

    Yeah, those states didn’t get flouride in their water until around 2012.

    Such a coincidence…

    It’s also completely silly because many places have naturally fluoridated water!

    • @ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      EU countries don’t add fluoride to the water supply. At least half of the US seems to have cognitive impairment, by the way they vote.

      Maybe they’re on to something?

      /s

  • @Loce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    152 months ago

    They should put lead back into gasoline as well, while they’re at it…and asbestos in a baby powder.

  • @solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1032 months ago

    next up (unless it happened first): no more data collection or research about statewide dental health

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      382 months ago

      Insurance companies will still collect it since they need to pay out for a lot of this shit. We’ll also be able to quantify this impact by looking at dental premiums and copays. They’ll eventually go up in states without fluoridated water.

  • @njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Somewhere there’s a cabal of dentists sitting around a table in a dark and shadowy room cackling madly

  • @PlaidBaron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -19
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Obviously fluorinated water is fine but having never grown up with it, it seems kind of unecessary. Maybe stop shoving sugary food and drinks in everyone’s faces would have a better impact?

    • @Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      122 months ago

      This is more targeted towards the poorest and least educated of the community. Eating healthy and having a stable home with healthy habits is expensive.

    • @null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      262 months ago

      This is anecdotal.

      Public health management isn’t really the same as making health related decisions for yourself and your family.

      As a public health measure fluoridation of water is an undeniable success. It has reduced the incidence of dental cavities by about a third, with better results in rural and poorer demographics.

      • @PlaidBaron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        02 months ago

        So rural and poor communities dont have access to healthier options or proper dental care and the solution your country picked was to put fluoride in the water instead of trying to actually support the poor.

        What a country.

        • @null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          Hmm. You realise we’re talking about Australia right? We have some of the best universal healthcare, and social security in the world.

          Additives like fluoride in water, iodine in salt, and folic acid in flour disproportionately benefit people with lower incomes because in many cases their nutrition and other health care is not great due to lifestyle preferences, or co-morbidities that are resistant to health interventions like substance abuse or mental illness or cultural norms.

          Another problem in Australia is low population density. A small town might be several hundred kilometers from the nearest dentist. If everyone in that place agrees to fluoridate the water, where’s the harm in that ?

          We do have government funded free dental services, although I admit the wait times can be considerable.

      • @stetech@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        While I understand that it’s a useful, effective measure, I’m amazed that it’s needed at all. Most of Europe, despite having a comparable or on paper lower wealth status, has never heard of this as far as I can tell, and the introduction of the practice isn’t being discussed. What gives the US needs it?