• @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    392 months ago

    He’s basically making the exact same argument as Faux News did, 30 years or more after anyone reasonable realized that they were blatantly lying.

  • paw
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 months ago

    I find it important that he writes, that freedom of individuals and markets is important because it is without coercion.

    To then go on and write that he tried to coerce his editor to accept the change with a “hell yes” or basically resign. This is coercion. Doesn’t he see this? Is the irony lost on him?

    • @gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      52 months ago

      I’m confident that free markets and personal liberties are right for America. I also believe these viewpoints are underserved in the current market of ideas and news opinion.

      He doesn’t give a fuck about whether his statements reflect reality at all, he only cares that his statements push reality towards being like how he thinks it ought to be, with him in charge and us under his thumb

  • @affiliate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    922 months ago

    Freedom is ethical — it minimizes coercion — and practical — it drives creativity, invention, and prosperity.

    this is a very interesting sentence to find in a post that outlines the ways in which the opinion page will be losing some of its editorial freedom.

      • @NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Hey, I like to think that sometimes I might feel the need to write remarkably similar sentences to the kinds that you, u/bearboiblake might have referenced in this particular editorial expression of human nature and sentiment in America, today.

        -You know, badly,

  • @inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    154
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets.

    Democracy dies in the free market.

        • @LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          32 months ago

          In a more democratic system there wouldn’t be president Trump because there would be no presidents. So I disagree with the premise.

          The presidency is fundamentally undemocratic, regardless of the quasi-performative democratic ritual by which he is selected.

        • @Raiderkev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          102 months ago

          I see this comment a lot, and I legit don’t think we did. I think it’s weird how Elon had this team of hackers ready to go for Doge. The weird, “they’ll never know what we did” comment out of his kid who seemed to be imitating Elon in the Tucker Carlson interview, and Trump’s odd vote counting computers comment has me seriously thinking they hacked it. I think they both had their backs against the wall. Trump with his criminal prosecution, and musk with the starlink investigation.

          With Elon, let’s start at the smallest issue. Recently Musk has talked about how he’s like the greatest gamer ever and is ranked super high in a bunch of games. Turns out he’s just paying people to grind those games and boost his ranking. He’s so concerned about being on top that he’s willing to hire people to get a top the leader board and lie about how good he is to stroke his own ego. It’s a very small thing, but points to a larger pattern of behavior for Musk.

          Now, onto the Ukraine thing. If anyone remembers, he wouldn’t let Ukraine use starlink for an attack because he was “worried it’d start a nuclear war.” Whether it would or wouldn’t was not up to him as the guy selling Internet satellites to the government. He had provided all the starlink kits to Ukraine during a war to help them, and the US was paying it. He was not supposed to be the arbiter of what they could/ couldn’t be used for. I wouldn’t be surprised if they were going to come after him for treason as he actively aided a (then) adversary through this action.

          https://apnews.com/article/spacex-ukraine-starlink-russia-air-force-fde93d9a69d7dbd1326022ecfdbc53c2

          Trump and Musk had to win, or they were fucked. The guy that worked for Doge happened to make a sketchy ballot counting app which you can read about below that could have been used to disqualify dem ballots.

          https://bsky.app/profile/denisedwheeler.bsky.social/post/3lhowh3ijgs2f

          Elon has always found ways around the rules. When his company needed money all of the sudden magically the value exploded. I think he was involved in squeezing the stock price up through the use of call options, and once that happened, they were able to raise money in the form of multiple stock sales. You can read this now 5 year old thread that proves itself time and time again. Do I have any proof Elon was behind this? No, but who has enough money to do something like this?

          https://www.reddit.com/r/options/comments/hk7nqe/tesla_infinity_call_gamma_squeeze/

          When the election came in 2024, Elon gave away (illegally I might add) $100 to anyone who registered Republican. There had to be something nefarious going on there too. I would not be surprised if they thought anyone who took them up on that was only doing it for the free money and wasn’t actually going to vote so they cast ballots in their names. Again, I have no proof, but if anyone would have the will to do something so shitty to win, it’d be him.

          As for Trump, Jack Smith said they had enough evidence to convict Trump, and only couldn’t because of arbitrary sitting president rules. They have like a 99% conviction rate for a reason.

          Trump and Musk are absolutely petty enough to bend / break rules and laws to get what they want, and are going to go all out to avoid prison. I strongly believe that this is not what we voted for, and we are going to be stuck with this the rest of our lives because what is happening cannot be undone, and they will cling to power as long as possible to avoid facing any consequences. They will break everything and fire anyone who was involved in any way shape or form in any of the investigations and will break the system beyond repair to ensure that they remain in power. Elections are still going to happen, but they will never be voted out.

          • @Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            62 months ago

            That’s a very well written comment, and Elon and trump certainly have committed more crimes than we can count, but the polls before the election were all pointing to the same result, so trumps victory wasn’t a major upset. I don’t think they hacked the election, I think the people are that dumb.

        • @metaldream@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          A real democracy wouldn’t allow a fascist to even run for office. Advocating for fascism and authoritarianism in a republic isn’t a valid political stance. It’s sedition.

          • @Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            -12 months ago

            Well, if over 50% of votes agree, is it sedition? The American people wanted the treasonous, corrupt, criminal, draft dodger sexual predator as president. We might not like it, but it’s what the majority wanted.

            • @metaldream@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              42 months ago

              *Plurality and it’s still sedition on the part of the leaders. If you advocate for authoritarianism in a republic then you are inherently advocating for overthrowing the republic. You are advocating for some people to have rights, while others don’t.

              It doesn’t matter if a majority of voters want that, they don’t have the right to strip the minority of their right to representation.

              All authoritarian ideologies are inherently incompatible with the concept of natural rights

              • @Tja@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                -12 months ago

                Those who don’t vote make an explicit choice, so it is a majority.

                And the fascist, dictatorial intentions were known from the beginning so kind of hard to argue with the result.

                People voted to convert the republic to an empire.

      • @TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        342 months ago

        anarcho-capitalist libertarian utopia?

        I hate that edgelord libertarians are trying to rebrand themselves as “anarcho-capatalist”. Anarchy and capitalism are antithetical to one another. It doesn’t have anything to do with anarchy if you aren’t evaluating hierarchy, and capitalism is literally one of the most hierarchical organizational structures possible.

        • @corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          182 months ago

          anarcho-capitalist

          So, sociopath.

          libertarian

          That’s like a narcissist hat on top of a sociopath hat. It’s a hat on a hat.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          142 months ago

          Fun fact: Conservatism was literally invented by a monarchist in the aftermath of the French revolution trying to find a way for an aristocracy to exist within democracy.

          • @futatorius@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            12 months ago

            Except England wasn’t a democracy at the time, it was a heavily rigged parliamentary system with a limited franchise, and it could be overridden by the Lords. But yeah, conservatism represented the interests of the aristocrats, in opposition to Englightenment notions like equality, accountability, rule of law and meritocracy.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness
              link
              fedilink
              22 months ago

              I at least was talking about Burke, whose most influential work was talking about the French revolution, not the English revolution(s). That one was, at least in the start, a proper democracy.

        • edgelord libertarians are trying to rebrand themselves as "anarcho-capatalist

          Actually, American style " libertarianism" IS anarcho-capitalism. They’ve just been trying to keep that a secret until recently.

          Anarchy and capitalism are antithetical to one another.

          Yes, and no. Anarcho-capitalism is anarchic in the colloquial “no rules, no order” sense, whereas political anarchy very much isn’t.

          The stupidity of the term is what makes it apt, though: the people politically illiterate enough to think that a total lack of regulations and worker’s rights would lead to anything resembling freedom also think that the colloquial definition of anarchy is the politically accurate one.

  • @imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    182 months ago

    What a pompous cunt.

    Washington Post was one of the few marginally respectable journalist organizations remaining. It’s a sad day for the freedom of the press.

      • @imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        marginally

        Maybe try looking up this word in a dictionary, it seems like you don’t understand what it means.

        What contemporary paragon of journalistic integrity do you subscribe to, if I may ask? Which organization is more respectable than WP?

  • @heavyboots@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 months ago

    Ah yes, the “personal liberty” to just accumulate wealth without limits or taxation because that is a “free market”. Never mind Amazon drives on roads built with federal dollars—they are a job creator and everyone should lick their boots for that.

  • The Giant Korean
    link
    fedilink
    English
    612 months ago

    We recently got rid of our subscriptions and canceled Prime. Wish we had done it much sooner, but better late than never.

    • @UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      For those on the fence on quitting Amazon: you can still use the website and shop, just search for the manufacturers website on stuff you want and purchase direct from them.

      You know, like going to a book store and ordering the books you find there from Amazon.

      • Kaja • she/her
        link
        fedilink
        42 months ago

        Also even if something very specific that you want isn’t available outside of Amazon, that’s all the more reason to definitely not buy it and message the manufacturer/seller and let them know why you’re not buying it. Boycotts will sometimes mean not buying something you really want to buy, that’s working as designed.

    • RobotsLeftHand
      link
      fedilink
      282 months ago

      Most decent manufacturers have their own website and fast shipping. I had to leave Amazon just for the fake and damaged merchandise alone.

      • The Giant Korean
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        I’ve already set up subscriptions with several manufacturers directly through their sites vs ordering through Amazon. Same or better prices, too.

      • @Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        52 months ago

        Yeah, I am currently dealing with my last couple returns through them before I can properly cancel. I consider it punishment for not doing it earlier.

        Ordered an ergo trackball, got sent the wrong model. Now since it’s through a third party seller my return documentation says I need to call the seller, on the god damned telephone, for a free return label rather than paying for postage myself. I haven’t even shipped the return yet and I have already been using one I bought direct from Logitech that was cheaper and arrived in 1-2 days with their free “4-7 day” shipping.

        I am also awaiting my third copy of a monitor that comes with a no dead pixel guarantee. The number of dead pixels has been nonzero and increasing with each new monitor. This isn’t necessarily Amazon’s fault – it took 3 tries to get my old 50" Panasonic plasma without a dead pixel – but sending returns right back out the door is entirely likely too. I have bought and returned far more expensive things that absolutely looked like they were used (pro camera lenses for one).

    • @technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Why would anybody pay for stuff that’s completely free to download?

      Maybe they gotta pay for a VPN but that’s quite affordable and people should be doing that anyway.

  • @Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    272 months ago

    I’m writing to let you know about a change coming to our opinion pages.

    We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets. We’ll cover other topics too of course, but viewpoints opposing those pillars will be left to be published by others.

    There was a time when a newspaper, especially one that was a local monopoly, might have seen it as a service to bring to the reader’s doorstep every morning a broad-based opinion section that sought to cover all views. Today, the internet does that job.

    I am of America and for America, and proud to be so. Our country did not get here by being typical. And a big part of America’s success has been freedom in the economic realm and everywhere else. Freedom is ethical — it minimizes coercion — and practical — it drives creativity, invention, and prosperity.

    I offered David Shipley, whom I greatly admire, the opportunity to lead this new chapter. I suggested to him that if the answer wasn’t “hell yes,” then it had to be “no.” After careful consideration, David decided to step away. This is a significant shift, it won’t be easy, and it will require 100% commitment — I respect his decision. We’ll be searching for a new Opinion Editor to own this new direction.

    I’m confident that free markets and personal liberties are right for America. I also believe these viewpoints are underserved in the current market of ideas and news opinion. I’m excited for us together to fill that void.

    • @Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      172 months ago

      Freedom is ethical — it minimizes coercion

      So employees coerced into working shit jobs or overtime aren’t free, thanks for clearing that up.

      • @futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        No, no. Those workers are entering into a contract with just as much power as the asshole billionaire owner has. But demanding that asshole billionaire to pay a fair rate of tax-- that’s coercion.

        There, did I do the libertarian doublethink dance right?

    • @Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      32 months ago

      I am really lost here. Is the idea to attract the exact same (super niche) readership as the wall street journal? We know from this election that there are very few voters in this domain, since this is exactly the type of voter Harris tried (and failed to) attract.

      Somewhat ironically we have gone from the very bad outcome of for-profit media, to the even worse outcome of newspapers as personal vanity projects for out of touch billionaires.

      • @futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        The idea is to stifle another well-established (though pro-establishment) voice of independent journalism.

  • @merdaverse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    17
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Freedom is ethical — it minimizes coercion — and practical — it drives creativity, invention, and prosperity.

    So buying a major newspaper and firing (or putting pressure on) anybody who doesn’t agree with the new owner’s “pillars” is not coercion? Did Bezos get this buff from the mental gymnastics?

    PS: surprised nobody mentioned Manufacturing Consent yet, which describes exactly what is happening here, and remains valid in the age of Internet