• @FelixCress@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    184 months ago

    For idiots who would like the UK to adopt American system instead:

    “NHS covers the cost of prosthetic limbs for those who need them. In the UK, there are around 55,000 to 60,000 patients who require prosthetic limbs due to amputation or congenital limb deficiencies, and NHS England allocates about £60 million annually for these services.”

    • @Veedem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      84 months ago

      If you read the article though, it appears as though a more basic prosthetic would be covered, but the one with electronics to provide greatly enhanced stability will not be.

      I’m in no way siding with the insurance company, but they’re not flat out refusing to cover the prosthetic.

  • nomad
    link
    fedilink
    384 months ago

    Tbh I was expecting the first comment to contain the name Luigi…

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    224 months ago

    Okay, I can spell out the “medical necessity” for you insurance companies in a way you’ll understand: mental health is important for physical health. You do things to improve mental health and you also improve physical health. So if you improve someone’s mental health now, you won’t be paying out for all of the later physical problems brought on by the stress and the knowledge that their life would be better if only some more miserly than Scrooge insurance company would let them have a fucking leg.

    • FundMECFSOP
      link
      fedilink
      184 months ago

      And having a prosthetic limb is important for physical health anyways. Helps you be more active, massively increases productivity (that’s what capitalists want right?), decreases wheelchair/caregiver costs, etc.

      It’s simply an all around win.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        154 months ago

        Excellent points. The increased physical activity part would also save these idiot insurance companies money, but they would have to think beyond the next quarter.

    • @qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Could be a punishment in the vein of “one of you defied, so you’ll all be punished.” Y’know, l everaging a person’s individual fear of being the “cause” for things getting worse to prevent them from attempting to make any changes. It’s a classic crackdown in authoritarian areas.

      Edit: not to say that’s what’s happening, but that is a methodology.

  • @ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    144 months ago

    You think a CEO has ever been beaten near death with a broken prosthetic limb? Just asking maybe that’s a thing.

  • @shininghero@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    34
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Lemmy Netizens Consider Offing Another Healthcare CEO, Questioning Their Industry Necessity - Fediverse News Network
    *not an actual news network. Yet.

    • @FirstCircle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      You’ll need to get a Prior Authorization on that offing to show that it’s Ethically Necessary. Fortunately you’ve come to the right place.

  • @TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    22
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Insurance companies push obvious lies to intentionally defraud the public. That’s their entire business model. That’s why your doctor had to fight through dozens of automatic rejections sent by the insurance company, they fully intend to lie in order to avoid making payments they agreed too when signing you up for insurance. A just society would be putting these people in federal prisons.

    • @RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      44 months ago

      But if it was socialized we would have death panels lol like this isn’t already a death panel with less guardrails

      • @nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        44 months ago

        That “death panels” bullshit was such obvious propaganda.

        The answer should’ve been “death panels already exist, would you rather them be civil servants or for-profit insurance agency accountants?”