• Nougat
        link
        fedilink
        375 months ago

        Malicious compliance. Do what you’re told, exactly what you’re told, no more, no less. Have you been doing “something” that nobody has told you to do, that’s outside of your job description? Stop doing that thing.

        Make sure you take your time. Don’t hurry. Haste burns you out, stop it. Do not start working before the start of your day, and do not work past the end of it. If you are doing this, you are enabling wage theft. Go home, your time belongs to you.

        !Resist@fedia.io

        • Ghostalmedia
          link
          fedilink
          English
          275 months ago

          The trick is to practice malicious compliance that targets Trump, and not American citizens who want watchdogs.

          • Nougat
            link
            fedilink
            95 months ago

            Trump wants to run these agencies his way, with his people? Fine. In the context of people who need to keep drawing a paycheck, doing exactly as you’re told is appropriate.

            Will this undermine these agencies? Of course, because they’re being run Trump’s way, with Trump’s people in charge. Will innocent bystanders experience fallout from this? Of course, because [same as above].

            There’s no going back to the way it was. The only way out is through, and the quicker we get to the tipping point, the better.

    • @Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      195 months ago

      That’s exactly what they want and I guarantee they will make it difficult for most employees so they do quit. An employee that quits on his own is a lot less expensive to the company then a fired one.

      A indefinite strike until musk is fired from his position in the goverment however…

      • @TheFogan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 months ago

        That’s exactly what they want and I guarantee they will make it difficult for most employees so they do quit.

        They’ve already explained that as their strategy… first thing they are targetting is removing remote work? Why, because they know some people don’t want to work in the office, and that’s a good way to get a lot of them to quit.

    • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      95 months ago

      If Govt services cease to function they fail

      And thousands if not millions of people die, depending on how long it goes on for.

    • @halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      185 months ago

      If Govt services cease to function they fail.

      Not sure if you haven’t noticed somehow… that’s exactly what the Republican party campaigns on and has been doing for the past 60+ years.

      They literally campaign on the idea that Government does not work. They get into office, then don’t do the job well, proving that it doesn’t work well. All while reducing funding and cutting programs until they fail. People that actually know what they’re doing leaving just helps them.

      Trump wants to kill branches, then show why they were made by their absence.

      They don’t want any of those programs or services, because they don’t give a shit about them. The wealthy don’t care about public education, their kids go to private schools. An educated workforce is harder to control. Critical thinking is a threat to propaganda. They don’t care about you wiling situation as long as they keep their quality of life at the top, which just requires money, which they make through indirect means off the back of everyday workers in destitution. They’d rather you be in jail for a bullshit offense where slave labor is literally still legal. Don’t have to pay the inmates.

      The programs they want still get plenty of funding and are in no danger. Things like the military and anything that can support the wealthy who don’t need it.

    • @Limonene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      505 months ago

      Don’t quit. Government workers are entitled to more recourse than normal employees if they are going to be fired. Usually you can’t just fire them for no reason.

      Quitting would also prevent severance pay.

      Sue for defamation. He called your work “fake jobs”. Now his followers are threatening your life.

    • IHeartBadCode
      link
      fedilink
      195 months ago

      So quit. You provide a valuable service. Don’t do it anymore.

      That’s what Musk is trying to do. Intimidate folks into quitting. So you’re just basically saying let Elon do the thing Elon wants to do.

      If Govt services cease to function they fail

      Yeah, that’s not the outcome anyone should want. When a function fails, we can’t just pop it back up when Trump isn’t President again. I had to go over this with the Trump term one tariffs. The reason Biden didn’t do away with them is because we violated the trade agreement to implement them. Once we violated the agreement, it doesn’t matter anymore what anyone does. It’s not fixable anymore. We have to go through decades worth of regaining political favor with the foreign country to repair it.

      Same thing here. When the service fails, we can’t just pop it back up once Trump is no longer in office. If people start to hurt because a function fails, those people are going to be hurting for decades while we try to repair the damage. It’s one of those stack of cups kind of thing. It takes a significant amount of time to stack the cups compared to the half a second it takes to knock them all down.

      then show why they were made by their absence

      All that’s saying is that the next two decades should be complete shit for everyone except the insanely wealthy. I would rather not have that lesson, I don’t think it’s required. I also don’t think a lot of people would even learn the lesson even if they experienced it first hand.

    • They’re working class people and the job market is shit. “Just quit” is a much bigger statement when you don’t have another job lined up and have bills to pay.

        • That’s a really bad take. A) Doing a job which is not specifically to carry out Trump’s will is not supporting him. B) Federal jobs are not inherently political, in fact very few are. C) even if they were in positions to effect political outcomes, they could use those positions to counter Trump’s agenda. They can’t do that if they quit. D) Nobody should be expected to abandon their livelihood for themselves and their families because they are tenuously, barely, kind of in a position that forwards Trump’s administrations policies. A USDA meat inspector quiting to spurnTrump will do nothing to Trump and yet ruin their career.

        • @randompasta@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          265 months ago

          What the fuck are you talking about? They had a job doing whatever random thing they were paid to do. Keep airplanes from falling out of the sky, checking water quality, doing accounting… The right always politicizes government jobs. For example, they under funded the 2020 Census in areas that had left leaning growth. That directly impacts the number of congressional seats.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          135 months ago

          Civil service positions are apolitical. You are supposed to do them regardless of which party is in charge. That’s the whole point. Otherwise literally nothing would ever get done.

  • @Schabrackentapier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -395 months ago

    Don’t like him and not sure how well this is gonna work out BUT there are too many useless people in government jobs in a lot of countries and with their work ethic they often couldn’t hold jobs in the more competitive free market so I agree with the core principle of what they want to do, but I am sure the approach will be total ass.

    • Emily (she/her)
      link
      fedilink
      95 months ago

      The problems in government are structural and systematic, not individual. The bureaucracy was built into what it is through the accumulation of regulations, poorly implemented policies and agendas, as well as plain mismanagement. Likewise, when the cost of a failed project is a political shitstorm and a parliamentary enquiry, and beyond that you are expected to be entirely accountable and transparent, you need to be risk averse.

      You can’t just fix these issues by proclaiming to fire everyone. You need to fix structural and leadership problems.

    • Pennomi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      315 months ago

      Yes, there is a shit ton of dead weight in the government contractor sector, just soaking up that delicious tax money for minimal effort. But I have a feeling these aren’t the employees being targeted right now.

      • @lapping6596@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        85 months ago

        That’d be cutting federal contracts. I read the headline as dealing with people employed directly by the federal government, not indirectly hired through private companies.

        I am you that it’d be a much better way to cut fat from the budget.

    • @capital_sniff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      25 months ago

      We just those useless folks Congress. But, seriously we can’t let a few lazies clogging up the works be the reason to allow Republicans to continue destroying our institutions.

    • IHeartBadCode
      link
      fedilink
      745 months ago

      Yeah I think that’s the frustrating part of this. Either allow elonjet back or get banned for doing this. But having it both ways shows how shit a person Elon Musk is.

      If anyone asks, to me, it’s THIS aspect of it that’s the big problem. Musk is literally doing the thing that he hated about elonjet.

      • @Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        655 months ago

        He’s always been a hypocrite and entirely untrustworthy. If you believe he is doing ANYTHING in good faith, it’s kind of on you at this point. If people stopped interacting with these fucking musk articles we wouldnt see them every 2 seconds.

    • @Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      15
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      We destroyed public education half a century ago to cut the oligarchs taxes.

      Half of our public still thinks giving the oligarchs the remaining crumbs they can no longer make corporate landlord rent with will somehow be urinated back on them as prosperity.

      Our public can’t learn.

      The ideal laborers. You can exploit them until they’re bruised and bleeding, then then just point at the powerless, starving, dying homeless person on the sidewalk and say they did it and you should hate them for it. Problem solved.

  • @atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    845 months ago

    This is vile. These are non-elected positions and the people who hold them are doing a job the government asked them to do.

    You can complain about the positions but you do not attack people personally over it. Especially if your followers are as stupid and dangerous as musk’s.

  • @LordGimp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    -445 months ago

    Honestly fuck federal workers as a whole. I spent 6 months working under the USCG through DHS and every single last civilian worker was either a nepotism hire, married to a service member and got handed the job, outright incompetent, or some combination of the 3. Trying to get in touch with ANYONE from HR was a 2 week wait minimum to answer the most basic questions, and it’s a coin flip whether the answer you got was even relevant to what you originally asked. I have never worked with a lazier bunch of entitled shitbags as I have in federal employment.

    They deserve every bad thing happening and more.

  • sepi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    405 months ago

    Wow elon is stupider than he looks. And he looks super stupid.

  • @HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    645 months ago

    This from the guy who smoked weed on the Joe Rogan p;dcast, talked about how he does ketamine at parties, and has been talking to Pootles for the last year, all while having a security clearance. Yeah

  • Tarquinn2049
    link
    fedilink
    645 months ago

    And yet Blizzard gets criticized for their writing of villains being too obvious and over the top.

  • @Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    625 months ago

    So misogynist Musk went after a bunch of women for online harassment?

    I hope they sue him. I seriously do.

  • @samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    325 months ago

    DOGE isn’t an actual department with any power, as it wasn’t created by an act of Congress. I guess Elon’s power will just be telling Trump who to fire?

    • @atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      95 months ago

      Directing angry mobs at people in these positions could be an effective way of vacating them whether it’s an “official” department or not.

    • @TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      75 months ago

      Im hoping when the time comes to actually create the department someone will inform Trump that’s not really something he can do, and Trump will just shrug and forget about it, while Musk starts crying in the corner.

  • @iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    105 months ago

    “One of the posts reads: “I don’t think the U.S. taxpayers should pay for the employment of a ’Director of Climate Diversification (she/her)’ at the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation,””

    Let’s then speak a bit about hyperloop you turd. Is that where you think tax money should be spent?

    • @Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      65 months ago

      Obviously tax money that goes to his companies = good.

      Tax money that goes to anything else = bad.

      Friendly reminder that SpaceX is almost entirely funded by launching starlink and government satellites. Without government contracts, our tax dollars, SpaceX could not afford to exist.