Green politicians from across Europe on Friday called on U.S. Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein to withdraw from the race for the White House and endorse Democrat Kamala Harris instead.

“We are clear that Kamala Harris is the only candidate who can block Donald Trump and his anti-democratic, authoritarian policies from the White House,” Green parties from countries including Germany, France, Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands, Ireland, Estonia, Belgium, Spain, Poland and Ukraine said in a statement, which was shared with POLITICO ahead of publication

  • @surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -65
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    People really need to stop assuming every Stein voter is a stolen Harris vote. I’d rather stay home than vote for Harris.

    I suspect the actual pushback is to prevent the Greens from reaching the 5% voter threshold, and making them a more viable party.

  • @SeattleRain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    146 months ago

    European Greens have always hated the US party. This may seem like politically aligned people asking a fellow traveler to stop but it’s not.

  • @leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    406 months ago

    Sheesh, you’re a bit late, folks. Besides, Stein is in the race specifically for the purpose of helping Trump win, so she wouldn’t listen to them anyway.

  • Queen HawlSera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    306 months ago

    “Why do you think I’m running? Isn’t this like telling me not to drink water to prevent hydration?” - Jill Stein probably

        • @shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -426 months ago

          meanwhile in the same universe. the cheney are as big of criminals as putin.

          doesn’t bill clinton has photos with Epstein ? its not like she is hugging him like biden hugging netanyahu. maybe he was there to poison her ?

          anyway people voting for her including me will write aoc rather than voting harris if there was no third option allowed. enough is enough.

          • @TachyonTele@lemm.ee
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            166 months ago

            anyway people voting for her including me will write aoc rather than voting harris.

            Oh boy, you’ll really be sticking it to The Man with that. You’re truly an important visionary, and everyone is totally taking you seriously.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              10
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              What’s fun is that it’s literally impossible to write in AOC in Indiana because you have to declare yourself a write-in candidate here and she didn’t.

              I had four options- Harris, Trump, RFK Jr. or the Libertarian.

              And I keep asking people like this who I should have voted for and who other Hoosiers have voted for. The closest answer I’ve gotten from any of them was a sudden heel-turn to “vote for who you like, it doesn’t matter.”

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            86 months ago

            I forgot to ask you!

            These are the four options in Indiana. No write-ins because you have to declare yourself a write-in and no one did. Who should Hoosiers vote for?

            • @shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -176 months ago

              vote for the candidate that best fulfills your expectations as a president. i am against voting just for the lesser evil. there has to be a minimum requirement for whats acceptable else we are begging this corrupt system to shit on us as much as they want. here most of us are struggling to make ends meet and they are giving billions to murder poor people in other countries. and don’t stop there. boycott all brands involved in lobbying or supporting genocide, boycott any candidates taking superpac funding. boycott msm peddling bullshit while ignoring the real issues.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                fedilink
                26 months ago

                Months and months of “don’t vote for Biden” and then “don’t vote for Harris” and then suddenly when the people like you who have been saying that are presented with the harsh reality that choices really are limited, are saying “vote for who you want.”

                Amazing.

                • @shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -16 months ago

                  vote for the candidate that best fulfills your expectations as a president. i am against voting just for the lesser evil.

                  what part of it you don’t get ?

                  harsh reality of what ? that we have to vote just blue unconditionally ? cool live in this delusion, but those fed up with dnc impostering are only going to become more determined with this current toxic campaign. the only thing other than “trump this stein that” we get from them is launching video games or snl shithousery.

                  so again vote for the candidate that worthy of presidency else we are only lowering the bar each election and soon will have someone worse than trump forced on us by dnc.

              • @blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                46 months ago

                Unfortunately, USA doesn’t have ranked choice voting. So voting for someone who doesn’t have a chance of winning is basically the same as throwing away your vote.

          • Midnight Wolf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            126 months ago

            as big of criminals as putin

            Hang on, let me just dig up their rap sheet on war crimes… oh, wait

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            246 months ago

            You get that nothing had to happen at the dinner, right? That’s not how networking works.

            • @Saurok@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              -216 months ago

              Okay, then prove that something happened. I’m not the one implying she’s some sort of Russian asset with 0 evidence beyond a photo. That’s you.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                fedilink
                146 months ago

                I don’t have to prove anything happened. She was put at a dinner table with Putin in Moscow. Something that only happens if Putin finds you useful. He doesn’t sit at random tables and strike up conversations with whoever he finds.

                You put the rest together.

          • WrenM
            link
            fedilink
            126 months ago

            No one is saying anything had to happen, but she was certainly invited there there for a reason.

            • @Saurok@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              -106 months ago

              Well, sure. I’m not saying that Russians didn’t have a nefarious reason to invite her there. It’s entirely possible and maybe even likely that they did it because they saw a third party candidate as a useful tool to sow some sort of election discord in the US. But that claim would be entirely different than the claim that Jill Stein did it because she’s an asset or that this was her idea or purpose for being there. I’m disputing the latter, not the former, because her attending a gala for RT is not evidence of collusion and this was the implication being made. I can find all sorts of pictures online of Hillary Clinton and other politicians having dinners with Trump or Putin, but that doesn’t mean the photos are evidence that they were in collusion with either of them.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                fedilink
                6
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                I like how you are completely overlooking the fact that I never made any actual claim about her being a Russian asset.

                You kept bringing up the asset thing.

                This is what I wrote:

                The asset part was a complete invention of yours.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              86 months ago

              You don’t get put at a dinner table in Moscow with Putin unless Putin has a good reason for wanting you there.

              He doesn’t just sit down with random people and hope they have a good time.

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  fedilink
                  86 months ago

                  That’s basically what this person seems to be suggesting. Like she just happened to be sitting there and Putin and all of his closest people were like, “let’s go see who this lady is and what she’s up to!”

          • Cethin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            96 months ago

            Of course she says nothing happened. It’s like a child getting caught with their hand in the cookie jar covered in crumbs, and they will insist they did nothing wrong. Never expect someone to be honest when it’s against their interests.

  • Aa!
    link
    fedilink
    77
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Isn’t it too late for it to matter? At this point, she’s on the ballots that she’s on, isn’t she?

    Especially for states like Oregon that are primarily vote by mail. I already have my ballot, and Stein withdrawing won’t keep people from voting for her

    • @dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      426 months ago

      Yes, her name is already on the ballots, like RFK Jr is still on the ballots in many states, but the hope is her supporters will listen to her endorsement. Just because a person’s name is on the ballot doesn’t force people to vote for that person. Some people have voted already, some will continue to vote for her out of protest, some will continue to vote for her because they didn’t hear she dropped out or didn’t care. But the hope is enough people will hear that she dropped out and endorsed Harris that their votes will come through for Harris.

      • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -29
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        You’re assuming we voted for jill because shes jill. Which is not the case for everyone. She got my vote because of Harris’ absolutely abysmal treatment of arabs and gaza, her lack of pro labor policies, etc etc etc.

        Jill dropping out would just meant the vote went to a different non-trump candidate or left blank.

        The only way harris would have gotten my vote was if she modified her position on gaza, or another key issues like ensuring kahn was kept.

        She declined to do so, so i declined to vote for her. 🤷 But harris will be fine my state is 20+ dem.

        • @Railing5132@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          186 months ago

          That’ll teach her! Way to go - you really stuck it to that horrible excuse of a candidate.

          It’s not like she had better labor policies (or practices) than that other guy (or did she?)

          It’s not like that other guy was (allegedly) working with an (alleged) war criminal to rebuff US efforts to make a ceasefire deal (or was he?)

          And finally, it’s not like AIPAC can literally thumbs up or down damn near any politician in the US like Julius H. Fucking, Ceasar and an almost universal bloc of voters will carry out their direction. Oh, wait, they will.

          The thing that pisses me off is that yeah, maybe she’s fine in Cali or Hawaii or wherever. But there’s gonna be a fuck of a lot more death and misery in the world if fascists get control of the United States in the form of Donald Trump, and in those few states that matter (because of the fucked up electoral college) that attitude , which I perceive as smug self-righteousness, could be the deciding factor.

          That simple worldview, unburdened with the whole idea of “you can’t make change if you’re not elected” must really be comfortable.

          But you sure showed Harris.

          I’d love to expound on this thought, but I have a fussy infant daughter that needs attending. BTW, it would be really cool if she FUCKING DIDN’T have to grow up in some goddamned Handmaid’s Tale dystopia.

          • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -8
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I agree it would be great if your daughter didnt grow up in such a dystopia. So tell me have you been emailing your critters to let them know to reverse course on gaza? Worker rights, (ala khan, health care etc?). Did you vote for harris in the prinary (rhetorical question obv)?

            Gaza is such a low bar, ‘dont send weapons to a country genociding’ we even have laws already on the books for this. Harris wants to claim herself as law and order she can follow the fucking law.

            Now as i said i live in 20+ state. My vote is literally wasted on harris. The best outcome we can get w/ harris is an absolute squeeker of a win. If she loses she has no one to blame but herself shes been getting told for months to reverse course on gaza. Biden has been getting told for a year. Their refusal is whats caused this.

            Now ask yourself: would you vote for harris if she reversed course in gaza? If the answer is yes, then why havent you joined us in pressuring her? All it takes is a lie to pollsters, calls to your critters, and a willingness to reduce her win ratio in deep blue states. dont worry we’re not asking you to vote 3rd party in red/purple states. Vote harris in those places if you can, if you can’t no judgement its not your fault harris ran on these policies.

            Whats more important is that we get every possible vote out down ballot. harris is secondary concern. What matters more is the house/senate. A harris win is essentially useless if we cant pass legislation. While a harris loss control of those chambers will be incredibly critical.

            You want roe v wade codified, focus on local reps and congress critters, ballot measures. You’ll have more success.

            • @Chapelgentry@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              56 months ago

              Yeah so the message so far has been carte Blanche vote third party. None of the nuance you’re displaying here is evident in 99% of these 3rd party posts. They’re all “genocide BAD, vote 3rd party or you’re COMPLICIT!” so the message here isnt what you’re saying.

              Secondly, applying your logic regarding wasted effort because your state is solid blue, telling others to write their congresspeople on the issue is equally useless. Throwing the onus on them is shortsighted. The, “what have YOU done” argument doesn’t really hold water with anyone, particularly when many people reside in a solid red or blue state

              Finally, voting 3rd party sends “a” message after the election, not during, and no candidate ever looks back at the election results to ask Greenies why they didn’t vote for them. They do canvassing before and during, and quite frankly they have to walk a tightrope between courting lefties and every other single-issue voter. Imagine you’re running and you have Greenies yelling about genocide, women’s rights yelling about bodily autonomy, and LGBTQ folks yelling about equality and all three don’t give a flying fuck about the others. What would you do? Exactly what Harris is doing - courting the biggest blocs of voters.

              I’m not gonna touch on the general laziness of my compatriots, but when I went to early vote at my precinct there were a lot of people voting straight ticket, so I don’t think most people will dig through ballots to send that message. Frankly, Trump in power means nothing for down ballot votes because he still installs a fascist regime.

              • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -36 months ago

                sounds like you think voting is a wasted effort in general. 🤷

                They’re all “genocide BAD, vote 3rd party or you’re COMPLICIT!” so the message here isnt what you’re saying.

                Genocide is bad, and we are complicit when we vote for harris currently. but thats because people are happy to vote for her mindlessly. not because the people trying to get her to shift are wrong.

                Finally, voting 3rd party sends “a” message after the election

                Oh I’ve been pestering my reps all year on gaza. and I continued to do so up through casting my ballot mid month in october. I’m just also able to happily follow through given the electoral makeup of my state.

                Imagine you’re running and you have Greenies yelling about genocide, women’s rights yelling about bodily autonomy, and LGBTQ folks yelling about equality and all three don’t give a flying fuck about the others. What would you do? Exactly what Harris is doing - courting the biggest blocs of voters.

                Well first off I’d recognize that most people are very happy not to support a genocide. and that maybe an administration with historically low approval isn’t a good model for success. zionists are not the majority of jews. many are perfectly happy if we withheld aid to israel based on our laws. if I was running Id happily point out israel is in violation of american laws and as soon as they begin complying and stop murdering innocents they’ll get their weapons back. So what we have here is a minority group (arabs) vs a minority of another minority group (zionists). in most states the loss of zionists wouldn’t tick the needle materially.

                LGBTQ+ are well justified and I’d support them; just as I’d support anyone seeking personal freedoms protections that dont infringe on others rights.

                Women are more than welcome to raise the banner over bodily autonomy as well they should. the government should have not be involved in decisions made between medical professionals and patients.

                I certainly wouldn’t tell citizens to sit down I’m speaking, remove them from my rallies for no reason. I’d simply recognize the fact they’re there for a reason and make time for them as part of the schedule as long as they’re not too disruptive the rest of the evening.

                You see, its fairly easy to differentiate oneself from harris’ behavior. I certainly would have given arab americans a voice at the DNC for example. they asked for one slot for christ sake. would have been a lot harder to nail harris to the wall if she wasn’t acting like a radical zionist on gaza.

                Frankly, Trump in power means nothing for down ballot votes because he still installs a fascist regime.

                it’d certainly be a problem, think maybe you can get harris to recognize her follies before its too late?

            • @Railing5132@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              7
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              I completely agree with your last two paragraphs. Regarding the rest, the other person that replied stated my thoughts in much more eloquent terms than I’m able at present.

              Edit: regarding the electoral and electorate math: I noticed you didn’t touch the “Trump working the Netenyahu to block a ceasefire” (which would obliviate the need for bombs), “you can’t govern if you can’t win”, and “AIPAC” topics, but also seem to think that all of this is Harris’ fault or she has control of this.

              • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -36 months ago

                correct. Harris will win my state regardless of my vote, hence its perfectly fine to vote with my distaste for her policies on labor and genocide. harris’ problems lie in other states.

                As for trump and a ceasefire. I didn’t think I needed to; Unless harris literally does that one thing she has so far committed to not doing, enforcing US law on weapon shipments to countries committing war crimes, Netenyahu will continue to do what hes currently doing make any ceasefire agreement DOA making the two admins immaterially different in terms of outcomes.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        226 months ago

        When I went to vote last week and saw RFK Jr.'s name was still on the Indiana ballot, I burst out laughing.

  • @spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    586 months ago

    European Greens must be dumb as fuck then, because the US Green party exists to:

    Get

    Republicans

    Elected

    Every

    November

    • @SeattleRain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -556 months ago

      Maybe if your candidate were more popular than a rapist felon you wouldn’t need to worry about the Greens.

    • @shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -53
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      and republicans exist the dnc can put a boogeyman every election so we will have to vote for these corrupt scammers. our political system is so broken that we either get lobbyists controlled genocidal hacks or a dumb racist genocider.

      its like asking to eat either dogpoop or vomited dogpoop

          • Midnight Wolf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            76 months ago

            This is how unaware and/or uneducated some people are. It’s been over two years since federal protection was removed.

            And people like this are voting. Given licenses to drive. Reproducing. Totally oblivious.

            • @aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              -36 months ago

              What? It is federally legal, it is just some states have bans. Contrast that with something like weed where its federally illegal but some states say they won’t prosecute.

          • Queen HawlSera
            link
            fedilink
            English
            256 months ago

            That’s news to a lot of women’s corpses in Alabama, Georgia, and Texas

            • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -16
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Sounds like a alabama, Georgia, texas issue. Easily handled by the people in those states. Just like it has been in every other state. Harris isnt even the solution for abortion nationally, she even admitted this; she wouldn’t do anything differently than biden. Congressional dems are.

              Learn to properly focus your energy.

              • Midnight Wolf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                5
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                “why don’t those people just immediately and magically fix their problems?” -this guy

                I swear, some people should not be allowed to reproduce. Understand nothing, but the first to speak up and argue.

                • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -4
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  lol, says the person ignoring the literal mountains of evidence saying an abortion ballot measure will pass literally in any state. it literally passed in kansas. Now if you want such a bill elect congress critters that will pass it. harris is immaterial until that happens. for some reason I doubt trump would veto such a bill; not because he said it but because he doesn’t generally care about shit unless it impacts him personally. But given congress has avoided passing such a bill in the past color me doubtful it will now. what else will they run on if not abortion and not trump? looks at harris’ policies

                  frankly if abortion is your defining reason to vote for harris well shrug that makes you a single issue voter and I thought they were bad? but maybe I’m fairly indifferent since my state already has enshrined abortions as law and I can’t solve all the worlds issues. especially the ones that are easily resolved at the ballot box.

                  so again, trump is an abomination, and learn to focus your efforts. harris isn’t some magic solution to americas problems. I’ll be over here getting ranked choice in my state.

                • @aidan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -26 months ago

                  All I said was that at the federal level abortion still is legal(which it is), and you just went on a tirade against me…

              • @Jumpingspiderman@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                106 months ago

                Except, I’m reasonably happy with what Biden’s done in his term. Especially when one considers what a second Trump term would be.

                • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -36 months ago

                  agreed, its too bad harris is fumbling the ball on such minor issues too, like labor rights and genocide. 🤷 no one to blame but herself.

              • Queen HawlSera
                link
                fedilink
                English
                56 months ago

                You sound like someone who would have questioned the need for ending segregation because it “Sounds like a [Spanish Word For Black] problem to me!”

                • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -76 months ago

                  mmmmmm; probably would have been shot in the war fighting against it more honestly. let me know when harris can single handedly pass abortion rights on her own that the discussion can go somewhere. as I said the fastest route to protecting access is via state legislatures. hence why what 8 states have it on the ballot this year? would I prefer it federally? sure. sadly for you all my reps already support such a position and I doubt trump would block it if the bill passed. but since such a bill won’t pass congress shrug.

                  Its not a compelling reason by itself to vote for harris; since you know… she can’t single handedly make it happen.

        • @shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -25
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          this excuse again ? talk to some women in real life ? they don’t want this cause insulted by even comparing it to butchering of all the women and children by our money ? what choice they had on getting aborted by idf ?

          did she got a choice ?

          or them https://truthout.org/articles/idf-shot-at-pregnant-civilian-outside-gaza-hospital-under-siege-staffer-says/ ?

          https://www.cbsnews.com/news/israeli-t-shirts-joke-about-killing-arabs/

      • @Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        466 months ago

        Two sides of the same coin am I right!? Get the fuck out of here with that bullshit.

        I grew up listening to Rush Limbaugh and other hate radio. There is no liberal comparison.

        They regularly called for the death of liberals amongst other horrible shit. The toxicity comparison is ridiculous when the other side is liberals saying they wish conservative voters were not misled.

        I get you don’t like the government. I don’t either, but this is not a god damned game of good cop bad cop.

        • @shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -27
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          They regularly called for the death of liberals amongst other horrible shit

          they are the same vocal minority as those on dnc side who have said if trumps wins then they want all muslims who didn’t vote for harris to be deported to gaza.

          they two parties may not be the same but they are both bad and corrupt enough that we need to start voting them out. after 2016 primaries i have no confidence in dnc to not rig the primaries against an actual liberal candidate again.

          there are easy things harris can still do to improve her chances but she is not even moral enough to disapprove genocide, progressive enough to disapprove fracking. she has failed upwards in the corrupt dnc as a token minority whose career has been of a smug prosecutor who has only looked down on minorities.

          but hey why not just run a propaganda campaign against jill stein who has been pro-climate since 1998.

          • @Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            29
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Trump fomented anti-muslim sentiment and literally passed a travel ban against Muslim countries.

            The RNC completely rolled over for Trump in ways far worse than the DNC snubbing Berny.

            Harris is not pro-genocide no matter how many times you say it. You make it out like decades of gloves on diplomacy with Israel is suddenly her fault.

            Trump is open to letting Israel do whatever it wants and while in office stroked tensions between Israel and Palestine several times.

            To blow off the fact that she would be the first woman president and to trivialize her to a token representative speaks a lot about your mindset.

            If Jill Stein endorses Harris knowing she is the only remotely pro-climate candidate that could win then perhaps she isn’t the piece of shit everyone says she is. I won’t hold my breath waiting.

            One side is climate change denialists and the other isn’t. Two sides of the same coin right?

              • @lemonmelon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                8
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                What an unwarranted insult to the noble equine!

                This Shadowfax is a cheap, flawed imitation. A dollar store replica. A sad, sad doppelganger.

              • FundMECFSOP
                link
                fedilink
                16
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Because politicians can’t just put somone in jail. The judiciary is an independent branch.

                Also you seem to be a 29 minute old account who has like 15 comments on a single issue and nothing else. Which is always sketchy.

                The entite purpose of your account seems to be “Harris bad”

            • @shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -15
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              To blow off the fact that she would be the first woman president and to trivialize her to a token representative speaks a lot about your mindset

              let me detail out the “tokens” here. do know that i am of indian origin as well.

              • immigrant : her mother comes from a upper caste rich family, harris grandfather was a officer in imperial service while many indians were being killed and jailed during its independence struggles. an upper caste privilege in india was worse than white privilege in US at that time. her mother was able to come here as an entitlement. so when dnc uses her as a symbol for immigrant struggles it irks a lot of indian’s whose parents have to escape india because of corruption and casteism and had to work hard to get here and survive in early days.

              and then there is her advocating for border wall and getting tough on immigration so basically adopting trump policy from 2016.

              • as a non-white she doesn’t seem very empathetic to them : this is an article from 2020 in herrald when she was already chosen as vp over warren (a woman) because lobbyist and mega-rich donors told bidden not to. if not for that she would never even gotten to be a dnc candidate here in 2024. warren was 3rd in the primaries way ahead if harris. warren today would have won by a landslide today and she has already called out on the genocide.

              so yes she is a token candidate from establishment.

              i am not even going to address other points as i am not voting or supporting gop. if a vp and presidential nominee don’t not even have power of condemning mass killing of children with our money then what’s the point of voting for them. choosing lesser evils never works it only brings more evil as we saw in 2020.

              then there are stunts like this which confirms to me that she is just a lobbyists placeholder.

  • @SarcasticMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    2826 months ago

    Haha they must be new to this, Jill Stein isn’t running for president, she is running to split the vote like they paid her to.

    • Diplomjodler
      link
      fedilink
      1016 months ago

      Of course they know that. They’re saying this to make exactly this point. While the average US voter will be entirely unaware of and oblivious to what some pinkos from cheese eating surrender monkey land say, potential green voters just might take notice.

        • FundMECFSOP
          link
          fedilink
          86 months ago

          I don’t like that phrase because it was used a lot by the american right when france refused to support them in the Iraq war and by far right figures in the UK during Brexit.

          • Diplomjodler
            link
            fedilink
            -26 months ago

            Of course. The way it was used here was to make fun of exactly those people.

            • FundMECFSOP
              link
              fedilink
              56 months ago

              If I recall correctly it originally started as something said by Willie in the simpsons but then a lot of people started saying it in real life to insult people based on nationality which is kinda fucked up and was condemned as xenophobic.

    • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -416 months ago

      Fun fact: if jill wasnt on the ballot harris still wouldn’t have received my vote. Harris losing votes has nothing to do with jill being there. Harris’ struggles are purely her own fault, propaganda from Russia only works if there is a edge to grab, the only reason there is an edge to grab is because harris has decided to treat arab Americans absolutely horribly this entire campaign.

      Learn to focus your energy properly: on changing Harris’ mind not the voters for whom preventing a genocide is important. Trust me it’ll be easier.

        • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -116 months ago

          in my state? it would have been left empty. you know thats an option right. you can say ‘none of these’.

            • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -4
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Do you understand how ballots work? They have more than one position on them. Yes id pass this election if there were not a single candidate with the moral grounding to not support a genocide.

              But there are two even! Makes it pretty easy. Esp since there is 0 risk of my state going trump. If only the rest of the country was as correctly grounded that harris would be the greater evil.

              Get it now? Been fucking telling you dunces in every post: in my state harris is literally the greater evil choice because trump isnt even on the map when it comes to viability. Its pretty nice, and you could have it to just by withholding support for candidates who support genocide. Not supporting a genocide is kind of a prior to having empathy which, i hope i dont need to explain why, is a really good quality for a politician to have. And harris doesnt. Withholding support its key to be explicit, does not necessarily mean withholding your vote as i did. It means speaking out, as i am, engaging others. And if its safe for you to do so with holding your vote.

          • @philthi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            46 months ago

            You’re not saying “none of these”, as it will ultimately still be one of them, more accurately you’re saying: “I’ll take either equally”

            • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -3
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Incorrect. Did you ever learn about the monty hall problem? You seem to struggle with applying priors to a situation.

              In my state the prior is: trump isnt even a blip of a possibility. We’re talking 0.00001% not a blip. Not gonna happen. Harris is literally the greater evil in my state. Go through my history.

              Its going to suck in a few days if harris loses because you nits thought that throwing labor, arabs and other minorities under the proverbial bus was a winning strategy.

              • @philthi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                36 months ago

                I don’t know about all that, I just enjoy logic. I’m replying to you saying “I’d choose not to vote”, that is not the same as saying “none of the above”, it’s the same as saying “any of the above”

                • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  and you’d be wrong. shrug you’re essentially saying anyone who doesn’t vote doesn’t have an preference. which is trivially incorrect. ask felons if they have a preference. ask teenagers.

                  if the prior is ‘harris will win’ me not voting for her isn’t a statement of ‘either’ its a statement of ‘I don’t need to support her shittiness’ you don’t get to assert what my preferences are certainly.

          • @jumjummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            56 months ago

            In that case, your voice is meaningless so you should just shut your mouth and let the adults continue to vote.

        • @lemonmelon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          106 months ago

          Oh! Oh I’ve seen this one in another thread!

          “I wouldn’t vote for either of them.”

          That’s not an option in this exercise, you have to pick one or the other.

          “I don’t see why I’d have to choose. I pick neither.”

          Again, that wasn’t the question. Harris or Trump are the only acceptable answers. If you have to choose one, which would it be?

          That’s how the exchange generally went. It shone a really nice spotlight on the ridiculous mindset at play.

          • @Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            86 months ago

            I’m waiting for jatone to chime in. Humans aren’t good at logic problems, especially real world ones where they don’t have to follow instructions. Ever try giving a logic puzzle to a 6 year old and they answer “well I wouldn’t do either of those things I’d buy an airplane and use a laser gun and then…”

            That’s what this stuff is. While I understand the desperate need to reform the system, you don’t do that by throwing the game. I know how unlikely it is to change their minds (and they already voted) but others reading this who aren’t as bull-headed might take half a second to re-evaluate the actual outcomes available from the actions to be taken. That’s the hope anyways.

            • @lemonmelon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              66 months ago

              Good on you for remaining hopeful! In cases like this, though, the ignorance is willful. They know how absurd they’re acting. Once the conversation goes past the point of their ability to just be obstinate, they abruptly cease responding.

          • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -116 months ago

            Hey look! you were right! I would choose neither. false dichotomy are not interesting questions. You’ll learn nothing from them since you know, they don’t represent reality. but in such a situation where only harris and trump were on the table. harris of course. but since that isn’t the case, and my vote in no way endangers the country to trump, but does allow me to point my reps and say ‘that could be my vote for you next cycle’ which I absolutely have done. my 3rd party vote is providing more value for my reps to push back on harris when they need to. particularly in defense of ms khan and gaza.

              • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -56 months ago

                Exactly what i said. Trumpet isnt even a blip of a possibility in my state. We’re talking 0.000001%. its pretty nice here we do good work.

                Harris is the greater evil in my voting scenario. Its going to be very unfortunate if she loses this week to trump because the rank and file couldn’t be bothered to pressure her over something as little as not genociding but ug here we are.

                I mean she has larger issues as a candidate but explaining those is 1000x harder than ‘genocide bad mmmmkay?’ and even that message is struggling to get through because trumpet has managed to make everyone absolutely insane.

                • @Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  56 months ago

                  I agree with a lot of what you just said there.

                  Just not your conclusion.

                  Does your vote not count in the national “popular vote” for some reason? With a race this … Whatever this is, don’t you think you’d want to give every possible advantage to the person that CAN defeat Trump? Especially somewhere that she is likely to win, aren’t you concerned many like-minded people will make the same mistake you are/did?

                  That’s kinda the playbook here. Each of you individually thinks “Harris will win this in my riding, so I’m allowed to be special and vote for a third party so I can feel good about myself!”

                  It’s literally why everyone is asking Jill to fuck off. She won’t leach any Trump supporters from him. But she will leach people like you from Harris.

                  It’s just selfish.

            • @jumjummy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              26 months ago

              You’re either a Russian agent, or a useful idiot. EITHER WAY, your opinion is worthless when it comes to American politics, so kindly skitter back under the rocks from which you came.

              • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -36 months ago

                And you struggle with understanding how to apply contextual information to a situation and clearly come to the wrong conclusions. Either way Ill gladly be her with my bullhorn making you uncomfortable with the sad truth you’re enabling a genocide.

      • @SarcasticMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        21
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Jill has a snowball’s chance in hell of winning and if you think voting for her helps the “Arabs” you are wrong. It cancels out your voice because Jill is not a viable candidate. Your vote has been effectively split.

        Your choices, like it or not, are Harris or Trump. So let’s break this down since you seem to think a vote for Harris is worse than not voting.

        Kamala Harris has prioritized a ceasefire in Gaza, advocating for Israel’s right to respond to Hamas attacks while emphasizing civilian protection and addressing humanitarian needs. Harris’s approach focuses on a three-part plan for Gaza’s future: reconstruction, enhanced Palestinian Authority security, and governance reforms to stabilize the area post-conflict. Harris, however, does not support an arms embargo on Israel but has backed withholding specific weapons amid Israel’s military operations in Gaza. She views a two-state solution as a path toward long-term stability, but she stresses that immediate efforts should be humanitarian and diplomatic to prevent civilian harm and prepare for a sustainable resolution.

        Donald Trump, in contrast, has heavily criticized ceasefire calls as limiting Israel’s ability to eliminate Hamas, framing his support as “unconditional” for Israel’s military objectives. Trump argues that his policies would have prevented the escalation of violence, asserting that Hamas’s attack on Israel would not have occurred if he were in office. While he has expressed skepticism about a two-state solution, Trump is more focused on empowering Israel to pursue military action without restriction. Trump has also suggested that his approach would involve exerting pressure on Israeli leadership if necessary to secure what he describes as a “final resolution” to the conflict, though specifics remain vague. Trump’s campaign has used pro-Israel rhetoric to appeal to voters and has signaled a hardline stance against Hamas.

        So, I am sure your voting for the lady who can’t win as opposed to the lady who can win will help the “Arabs” you seem to care so much about. Good on you for picking a hill to die on though, I hope you like it because you and your people are about to die on it.

        • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -116 months ago

          Try not to tell me what my choices for president are, my ballot clearly listed them.

          1. Harris / Waltz
          2. Trump / Vance
          3. Cornel West
          4. Jill
          5. Claudia

          Now fun fact: my state is 30+ dem. I can vote for whoever I chose at 0 risk of trump getting those electoral votes. And I happily exercised that this election rather than vote for a candidate with is hostile to not only labor, but apparently is quite happy enabling a genocide.

          Now if I was in a different state would I behave differently? absolutely. but I’m not, many people are in the same position as i am. harris lost my vote and I had 0 compelling reasons to give her a hand based on her words and deeds. She was a bad candidate in 2020, and shes a bad candidate today. try to focus on the issues that actually matter. my critters know why I handed jill the ticket.

          If you want harris to win instead of trying to wow me with your inane rambling about my voting options spend your effort on getting harris to see reason before she blows it in 3 days.

            • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -11
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              next time try not to be an asshole to people pushing for good changes and respect people have different options than you. but given your response, thats probably impossible for an asshole like yourself. bless your heart.

              • @SarcasticMan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                146 months ago

                Lol, you can’t counter bless your heart with bless your heart that’s not how it works.

                Just because I told you you were wrong does not make me an asshole or disrespectful of your opinion. Jill Stien is a vote splitter, that’s the original point. No 3rd party candidate has any chance of winning in any state and a vote for one splits the vote. Your condescending response and personal attacks don’t change that.

                Look, I am just happy you are voting and if you hadn’t been condescending I would have talked more with you about it. I wish I lived in a state where I could throw my vote away in a form of futile protest but I dont, and there is a lot we could continue to argue about that point, but you decided to call my thought-out rebuttal “inane rambling” and then prove my point by stating that if you didn’t live in a solidly blue state you would feel differently. So instead of engaging further, I gave you a bless your heart and walked away.

                I am bored though so here I am engaged in the most noble of futile endeavors arguing with stupid on the internet…Fun fact, that’s me being an asshole.

  • @DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -186 months ago

    a post I made earlier:

    If Harris loses California, New York, Massachusetts, Maryland, Connecticut, Hawaii, Vermont, DC, or Maine-1 because of vote-splitting by Stein, it will be Harris’s fault. If you’re voting in these states, you might as well vote your heart.

    https://lemmy.world/post/21147692

    • @Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      96 months ago

      The Green party isn’t a party worth anyone’s heart. It’s all a big grift funded by conservatives that only puts any effort into the scammy presidential run. I don’t want more of that, I want progressives that challenge moderate Democrats in safe seats to give people a real option to move left.

      I’m in Hawaii, and we’re solid blue but last election the Greens had a whole of 2 candidates across the entire state. Some random party I’d never heard of had more candidates on the ballot. My state rep won with something like 2000 votes, no Green challenger in sight. If the Greens were a real party they’d jump on that opportunity. A little sweat and door knocking can pull off 2000 votes. Hell, we have Ed fucking Case in Congress. I’d kill to vote against him, but my only other option is a MAGA conspiracy theorist.

      The GPUSA isn’t a real party.

      • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -56 months ago

        See this is your issue assuming we give a shit about jill or the green party. 😂

        We dont. it was just a convenient box to tick because harris’ campaign tried to remove her from the ballot, and fed their bullhorns the line about splitting the ticket. The vote would still have been cast for a different third party candidate unless Harris’ position was corrected. It wasnt so the box gets ticked away.

        Learn to properly focus your political energy: its much easier to get harris to flip than getting a million voters who have morals to flip.

        So unless you want what is happening in gaza: learn to lie to your politicians.

        1. Tell them you’ll vote third party over x.
        2. Follow through if you’re in a deep blue state.
        3. Hedge your bet by voting Democrats down ballot.
        4. Always lie to pollsters about your intent for any given candidate. The less reliable polls are the better. Means your letters to your politicians are more important.
          • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -26 months ago

            possibly. cruz is a little bit too nutty. might have also left the presidential ticket empty. I probably would have gone the latter route. jill was just amusing due to the harris campaign trying to get her rejected from ballots.

        • @Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 months ago

          Learn to read:

          The Green party isn’t a party worth anyone’s heart.

          You don’t counter this with “we don’t really care about the Green party”. Go repeat your argument somewhere that makes sense. I don’t care about the 5D chess you think you’re playing.

          • @jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -3
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I’m sorry you made an assumption about what jill stein represents to people like me who checked that box knowing full well who she is, what she represents and that it made your entire argument fall flat. 🤷

            Its not my fault you don’t get why harris is a shit candidate. we’ve been warning you for months now. thats why harris is struggling. not because of anything jill has done. I certainly didn’t make the democrats try to ban jill from ballots. now she just represents a convenient protest vote. if harris loses in the next 5ish days after the ballots finish being counted, well it certainly will be unfortunate. I’m 🤞 she doesn’t but we tried to get her to change her policies before it was too late.

      • @DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -1
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        wp:2020 United States presidential election in Hawaii#Results

        wp:Howie Hawkins

        Howard Gresham Hawkins III[1][2] (born December 8, 1952) is an American trade unionist, environmental activist, and perennial candidate from New York. A co-founder of the Green Party of the United States, Hawkins was the party’s presidential nominee in the 2020 presidential election. His ideological platform includes enacting an eco-socialist version of the Green New Deal—which he first proposed in 2010—and building a viable, independent working-class political and social movement in opposition to the country’s two major political parties, and capitalism in general.[3]

        wp:2024 United States presidential election in Hawaii#Results

        Apparently RFK, Jr isn’t on the Hawaiian ballot, though your state has write-ins.

        slim pickings here:

        wp:2024 United States House of Representatives elections in Hawaii

        however,

        wp:2020 United States House of Representatives elections in Hawaii#Results 2

        Aloha ʻĀina

        Jonathan Hoomanawanui

        6453 votes

        2.37%

        wp:Aloha ʻĀina Party

        The Aloha ʻĀina Party (Hawaiian for “love of the land”) is a political party in the US state of Hawaiʻi that advocates for the Hawaiian sovereignty movement and the promotion of Native Hawaiian culture.[1][2]

        • @Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          46 months ago

          Why on earth would you feel compelled to educate me about my local politics by pulling up some wiki pages and then refusing to even format your message? And why the fuck would anything in this post indicate RFK might be someone to vote for? The theoretical appeal of the Greens is progressivism, not the unfortunate antivax shit that’s glommed onto it.

          And Aloha Aina is the local party I had never heard of before seeing them on the ballot, which may sound good to you because you know nothing about Hawaii, but is something in the vague realm between nutjob sovereign citizen types and conservatives that can’t bear to be Republicans due to history.

          • @DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            (my bold)

            Why on earth would you feel compelled to educate me about my local politics by pulling up some wiki pages and then refusing to even format your message?

            and,

            And Aloha Aina is the local party I had never heard of before seeing them on the ballot,

            TIL

            And why the fuck would anything in this post indicate RFK might be someone to vote for?

            I don’t know, but it might be saying something about ballot acess laws in Hawaiʻi.

            The theoretical appeal of the Greens is progressivism, not the unfortunate antivax shit that’s glommed onto it.

            fair enough.

            And Aloha Aina is the local party I had never heard of before seeing them on the ballot, which may sound good to you because you know nothing about Hawaii, but is something in the vague realm between nutjob sovereign citizen types and conservatives that can’t bear to be Republicans due to history.

            according to WP:

            According to its website, the Aloha ʻĀina party advocates for a sovereign Hawaiʻi through the framework of hoʻoponopono (“making right what is wrong”), believing the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom to have been an unjust act. It also promotes other Hawaiian values such as Mālama ʻĀina (“taking care of the land”) and Aloha Kānaka (“love and care for the people”).[2]

            • @Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              36 months ago

              Dude, I live here. I looked them up when I saw them and read the same dumb statements you’re copypasting from Wikipedia. Which, surprise surprise, is not the whole fucking story. You don’t live here and don’t know anything about the politics here, so stop relaying useless wiki text.