• @neidu2@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      217 months ago

      Contrary to popular belief, you are actually factually spot on. It is all described in detail in soviet-era files, locked away.

      Even JD Vance confirms this, ans I challenge FSB to release any documentation that disputes it.

  • beefbot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    77 months ago

    Putin’s job is to bounce on my dick.
    Fuckin shorty mktherfjcker im so sick of that twerp and everyone who thinks like him

  • @abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    147 months ago

    Anyone who can look at a human being and say “this is what your just do no matter what because of what parts you have and nothing else” doesn’t see others as full people.

  • @stupidcasey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -97 months ago

    All living things purpose is to reproduce, that being said, If your leader tries to restrict your freedom’s to your most basic instinct you can probably find a better value with someone else.

      • @stupidcasey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -6
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It doesn’t matter. If a living thing “chooses” not to reproduce, it will not pass on its genes, and that decision was detrimental to the species. As such, it no longer exists. This could still be considered a choice, just a flawed one. However, this has taken place trillions of times throughout history, and anything that made that choice was weeded out. You might not understand your purpose, and you might die before fulfilling it, but make no mistake: you have a deep evolutionary instinct to prioritize reproduction over anything else. Everything else consists of instrumental goals that emerge from the primary goal of reproduction. It is literally mathematically, scientifically, psychologically, sociologically, experimentally, and simulatively PROVEN—to the extent science can prove anything and even further thanks to mathematics.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

      • @stupidcasey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 months ago

        Incorrect, you can purposely build things, you can build a birdhouse for the purpose of housing birds, a factory can build a car for the purpose of driving and cells can build a human for the purpose of reproduction.

  • @Soup@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    287 months ago

    There’s this shit, and there’s people right here on lemmy that worship the ground this piece of human filth walks on.

      • @Soup@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        87 months ago

        Oh I don’t. But the fact that there are people here that will, does concern me.

      • @volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        People will probably say hexbear or .ml, but I’ve been browsing hexbear lately and haven’t seen any of that. In fact today I saw a post bringing attention to this particular topic (Russian gvt cracking down against “childfree lifestyle”)

    • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      76
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Right-wingers reach for these religious or moralistic justifications and laws, but Putin is probably just noticing, like many other countries, that their economy is screwed if their birth rates continue to decline. And yet the planet is screwed if we continue to increase. As climate change eats away at the habitable areas of the planet, the obvious thing is for habitable countries with declining birth rates to accept many immigrants from places climate causes people to flee from. This will help those people and help the receiving country’s economy. Unfortunately the right wing is also too wrapped up in xenophobia to accept this solution. They’d rather double down on controlling women.

      • @dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        527 months ago

        I recently heard a “housing expert” say that cities have to keep growing, there’s no sustainable static level of population, and I thought “there’s better be or we’re all fucked.”

        The problem with capitalism is that it only works if there’s perpetual growth, which (as many before me have pointed out) is the logic of cancer.

      • @MehBlah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        67 months ago

        Economies are only screwed with declining birthrate if the goal is unlimited growth. What will happen if the trend continues is stability. Stability is bad for empire building types. It leaves less room for manipulation.

        • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          In any country with public healthcare, there is a problem with how to afford to care for the elderly when the population contains more elderly people needing expensive healthcare than working people paying the taxes that fund it. This seems like a problem that extends beyond capitalism’s growth-seeking. It’s an issue of how to achieve stability.

          • @MehBlah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            37 months ago

            That is the hole you dig with the myth of unlimited growth. No doubt the correction will be somewhat uncomfortable.

    • @angrystego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      167 months ago

      New ones are born every day, as the “women’s purpose” dictates. I wish it was a generation thing, but I’m afraid it’s ingrained on a deeper level.

  • Vieric
    link
    fedilink
    English
    577 months ago

    No wonder Republicans love this asswipe…

  • @MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    37 months ago

    Pooty poot knows how bad off russia really is. The population has taken several generational hits in the last hundred years and he just delivered another. To him women are nothing but things and those things better be producing male cannon fodder.