• Boomers are having their last dance in charge.
  • Gen X leaders are stepping up to replace the last of them.
  • Younger leaders are taking charge of politics and corporate giants such as Boeing, HSBC, and Costco.
  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    199 months ago

    I’m amused with all the people who think there’s some hard line where you have to be born before or after some exact year to be of a named generation as if this wasn’t all made up. A baby didn’t get labeled Gen-X if they were born after midnight on a certain day.

    As far as I’m concerned, she’s Gen-X. She was 13 when Star Wars came out.

    • @razorwiregoatlick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      139 months ago

      Maybe I am missing something but you do have to be born before or after some exact year to be of a named generation. That’s kind of the definition. Gen X is 1965 - 1980.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        129 months ago

        Dude, it’s all made up and there is no hard definition for the years of Gen X.

        I mean if you really want to be pedantic about it, the people we call Boomers these days are the original Gen X.

        The term Generation X has been used at various times to describe alienated youth. In the early 1950s, Hungarian photographer Robert Capa first used Generation X as the title for a photo-essay about young men and women growing up immediately following World War II. The term first appeared in print in a December 1952 issue of Holiday magazine announcing their upcoming publication of Capa’s photo-essay.

        Or maybe it’s people born in the 1950s and 1960s?

        The term acquired a modern application after the release of Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture, a 1991 novel written by Canadian author Douglas Coupland; however, the definition used there is “born in the late 1950s and 1960s”, which is about ten years earlier than definitions that came later.[16][17][13][18] In 1987, Coupland had written a piece in Vancouver Magazine titled “Generation X” which was “the seed of what went on to become the book”.

        Or maybe it’s 1965-1980?

        In the U.S., the Pew Research Center, a non-partisan think-tank, delineates a Generation X period of 1965–1980 which has, albeit gradually, come to gain acceptance in academic circles.

        Or maybe it’s “Gen X is whatever we decide it is.”

        The Brookings Institution, another U.S. think-tank, sets the Gen X period as between 1965 and 1981.[31] The U.S. Federal Reserve Board uses 1965–1980 to define Gen X.[32] The U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) defines the years for Gen X as between 1964 and 1979. The US Department of Defense (DoD), conversely, use dates 1965 to 1977.[33] In their 2002 book When Generations Collide, Lynne Lancaster and David Stillman use 1965 to 1980, while in 2012 authors Jain and Pant also used parameters of 1965 to 1980.[34] U.S. news outlets such as The New York Times[35][36] and The Washington Post[37] describe Generation X as people born between 1965 and 1980. Gallup,[38] Bloomberg,[39] Business Insider,[40] and Forbes[41][42] use 1965–1980. Time magazine states that Generation X is “roughly defined as anyone born between 1965 and 1980”.[43] George Masnick of the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies puts this generation in the time-frame of 1965 to 1984, in order to satisfy the premise that boomers, Xers, and millennials “cover equal 20-year age spans”.[44]

        In Australia, the McCrindle Research Center uses 1965–1979.[45] In the UK, the Resolution Foundation think-tank defines Gen X as those born between 1966 and 1980.[46] PricewaterhouseCoopers, a multinational professional services network headquartered in London, describes Generation X employees as those born from 1965 to 1980.[47]

        But those are just think tanks. Surely other experts have a specific range, right?

        On the basis of the time it takes for a generation to mature, U.S. authors William Strauss and Neil Howe define Generation X as those born between 1961 and 1981 in their 1991 book titled Generations, and differentiate the cohort into an early and late wave.[48] Jeff Gordinier, in his 2008 book X Saves the World, include those born between 1961 and 1977 but possibly as late as 1980.[9] George Masnick of the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies puts this generation in the time-frame of 1965 to 1984, in order to satisfy the premise that boomers, Xers, and millennials “cover equal 20-year age spans”.[44] In 2004, journalist J. Markert also acknowledged the 20-year increments but goes one step further and subdivides the generation into two 10-year cohorts with early and later members of the generation. The first begins in 1966 and ends in 1975 and the second begins in 1976 and ends in 1985; this thinking is applied to each generation (Silent, boomers, Gen X, millennials, etc.).[49]

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_X

        This isn’t science, it’s categorization based on pretty arbitrary stuff.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            -19 months ago

            I just showed you my point quite well. That there’s no agreed-upon definition of the term like you suggested. All I can think is that you read nothing I pasted.

            • @razorwiregoatlick@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              59 months ago

              No, I didn’t suggest that. I asked for clarification because you said it amused you that people thought being born before or after some year made you part of a generation. That is literally the fucking definition! There are certainly different definitions of those generations but regardless they are all based on a person being born before or after a certain year.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                fedilink
                -2
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Your words:

                That’s kind of the definition. Gen X is 1965 - 1980.

                I showed you very clearly that it is one of many definitions of Gen X. Some of them apply to Harris.

    • @Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      49 months ago

      I agree. I think they do pop up every now and then, always for a cultural event. For example, I draw the line between Millennial and Gen Z at remembering 9/11.

    • @tipicaldik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      41
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      She’s Generation Jones. So am I (b. 1963)

      Damn, they even have her picture on the page 😆

      Generation Jones is noted for coming of age after a huge swath of their older siblings in the earlier portion of the Baby Boomer population; thus, many note that there was a paucity of resources and privileges available to them that were seemingly abundant to older Boomers. Therefore, there is a certain level of bitterness and “jonesing” for the level of doting and affluence granted to older Boomers but denied to them

      • @EnderWiggin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        459 months ago

        This reminds me of the Xennial generation that fell between X and Millennial. This also sort of shows how little we can really actually equate from these 20+ year generational spans. Really I am just happy she’s not old enough to collect SSI yet.

        • @tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          289 months ago

          Hard cutoff dates for generations has always been a stupid concept. Imagine believing that an Xer born in 1980 has more in common with an Xer from '65 than a millennial from '82.

          • @merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            19 months ago

            Named generations is a stupid concept in general. It’s vaguely useful as a shorthand to talk about people’s life experiences based on when they were born and how old they are now. But, it’s mostly like astrology, saying that people born under a certain sign behave a certain way.

          • @wjrii@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            129 months ago

            Family context also plays a role. My wife and I are “officially” Xennials, born a year apart in the late 70s. I have a brother seven years older than me, and she was the first born. I skew way more Gen X than she does, to the point where she doesn’t see any point in describing herself as anything other than a Millennial.

            • @bitwaba@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              79 months ago

              Yeah, I was born in 84 but I identify pop culture wise much closer to my step brothers that are 1.5 and 3.5 years older as Xennails than I would my millennial counterparts.

    • @bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      169 months ago

      The dates for these generations are not set in stone. Lots of organizations use 1965 to 1980 but the US SSA uses 1965 as the start.

      People born around the transition points are going to have more in common with each other than with people born earlier in the date range. Especially when you consider families having kids a few years apart but each is apparently a different “generation”.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_X#:~:text=U.S. news outlets such as,born between 1965 and 1980".

    • @padge@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      329 months ago

      I can’t tell if she looks young for her age, or if she looks super young compared to everyone else on stage wirh her

      • Catma
        link
        fedilink
        28
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Probably a combination of three things. First hate ages you terribly, example Laura Loomer, Alex Jones. Second she is a child compared to Biden/Trump. And third and finally as clichè as it is black dont crack

        • Ghostalmedia
          link
          fedilink
          English
          199 months ago

          Also, and this is a biggie, she didn’t have kids. Kids harvest your life force in order to grow.

  • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    60
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    As a member of Generation X, I would say that it’s not going to be much better.

    Just look at, say, Elon Musk as an example of the kind of people from my generation who get to positions of influence.

    Most GenX are the product of the Neoliberal era, so have interiorized the whole “lookout for numero uno” idea of how to be in society and whilst commonly aware of things like Climate Change, they’re usually unwilling to inconvenience themselves for the sake of fighting against it, quite the contrary even (just look at how well SUVs sell), and similarly when it comes to Consumerism, they seem to be the most prone to wasteful consumption (the kind of people who replace their mobile phones every year or two).

    In summary, Gen X generally are more well informed than Boomers but even less principled than them.

    • Probably a product more of age than of generational specificity.

      You get used to your comforts, you probably have investments, you’re consumed by trying to get ahead enough so that you don’t have to die at your job, just in a nursing home what takes all of your money.

      Gen X myself, and maybe an outlier, but I’ve probably become more radical as I’ve aged rather than the other way around. I’ve been stuck being poor for decades before finally “making it”, and that has really driven home the awareness of how fragile it all is. That, and just general omnivorous reading that includes a lot of depressing scientific literature regarding climate change. It’s terrifying.

      I vote for the left (I would have happily voted for Sanders), support local measures and politicians that lean towards social policy and move towards things like green power, etc.

      So yeah…not necessarily a thing you can just pin on a generation, though each generation will have some stronger proclivities than others in certain areas. The millennials will have to watch out, they’re next to fall for circling the wagons to protect whatever they might have, hate on their gen’s billion- or trillionaires.

      • @Chakravanti@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        -1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        We won’t be next because no one will be. Prove me wrong. Good fucking luck. You won’t acknowledge what must be done.

    • @schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      69 months ago

      I was born in the 1990s and teenage me thought that the future would be awesome because people like me would be in power.

      By now, people my age and younger have reported back, become politicians, celebrities, journalists or otherwise people with more power than me, and said “nah, we are pretty much the same as our parents were, some of us are awesome and some horrible”.

      • @Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        49 months ago

        The type of people who seek power probably won’t change generation to generation… But the voters are changing rapidly as boomers die and millennials/zoomers replace them (far more progressive overall)… The voters will force the change, not the small percent that seek their own glory (ie the list you have there)

        • @Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          29 months ago

          Millennials will become the largest voting bloc, and Gen Z tends to follow their lead. I predict the next decade is going to see some massive changes in governments.

          • @nomous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            29 months ago

            The movement we see in the right, the coalition of ultra capitalists, nationalists, and evangelicals is the death throes of the GOP as we know it if they’re not successful in seizing power in the way they’re trying right now.

      • Dave V
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 months ago

        This. I was born in the 50s and we thought the same thing in our teen years with the same outcome.

    • @Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Honestly, given the money Gen X has, Gen Z would mostly probably do the same.

      While some of our actions can be directed by principle, mostly it’s just shrinking income.

      I wish we could raise wages AND use them to embrace Buy It For Life items, all while subsidizing public transportation etc etc.

      But now it’s lack of money that holds Gen Z back, not principles, in my opinion.

      • @Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        149 months ago

        Gen z understands that the rich are the cause of their poverty, not immigrants or libs or other poor people. That’s a big step in directing action in the right direction.

        • @Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          59 months ago

          Fair, though I wonder how much of it is real change and how much is our information bubble. Hopefully mostly the former, but I absolutely do hear all those “fuck immigrants” and “I’m to blame, I just gotta work harder” attitudes around.

          • @Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            29 months ago

            Yeah… I guess it’s more like, millennials were the first generation to have a majority get it, and Gen z is even better about getting it… But it’s still not 100%

    • @limelight79@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      259 months ago

      Gen X here, too.

      DeSantis is younger than me.

      That’s all I’m going to say. Gooooooooooo Millennials and Gen Z. PLEASE.

      • @whoisearth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        39 months ago

        Once they hit our age they’re be equally shit. The only thing that makes us endearing is that we are a forgotten generation for the most part. No power. No numbers. But fuck me have we got influence.

      • @Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        129 months ago

        I was born right on the border of Millennial and Gen X. Tory leader Rishi Sunak was younger than me.

        Generation really doesn’t matter. Greedy cunts rise to the top and always will.

        Today’s horrible influencers are tomorrows horrible leaders.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Elon Musk as an example of the kind of people from my generation

      Elon’s an Afrikkkaner fratbro social media junky with $200B to his name. That’s just not the lived experience of most Americans.

      Most GenX are the product of the Neoliberal era

      They’re nostalgic for the 90s, because it was a time of relative abundance. They’re not all Chicago Economics School trade globalists with a hard on for abolishing the minimum wage and privatizing social security, because none of them stand to benefit from any of that shit.

      they’re usually unwilling to inconvenience themselves for the sake of fighting against it

      You’ve got a selection bias. The GenXers who fought the fiercest got crushed the hardest. Prisons are choke full of social revolutionaries who got swept up in the 90s/00s Law and Order era. Hospital wards are full of GenXers pumped full of opioids to treat work-injuries and heavy metal poisoning. Morgues are full of GenXers who died in the service sector job filling lunch orders during COVID or were wiped out in the AIDS epidemic before it was treatable.

      Losing doesn’t mean you weren’t fighting. It just means you were outnumbered, outspent, and outmaneuvered. For every Kamala Harris or Ron DeSantis who climbed up through the bowels of the system to live in its head, there are thousands who got crushed under its feet.

      Gen X generally are more well informed than Boomers but even less principled

      The folks you’re seeing are simply the ones that made themselves useful to the ruling class. One thing the GenX crowd was right about - the Revolution wasn’t televised. It was a war fought and lost in the back alleys and the boiler rooms and the darkest cells of solitary confinement. If the GenX capitalist class is looking extra cynical, that may be thanks to all of their relatives and neighbors they had to stack up like cordwood to reach these heights.

      • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        Whilst I did not live in the US, I did live in 4 countries in Europe (having got involved in politics in 2 of them) and from what I’ve seen those GenXers who fought for a better World are not the majority, not even close.

        As somebody in that cohort and hence having moved along with it over the years through school and work, the general impression I got over time is one of political apathy and consumerist self indulgence.

        (Certainly I was generally the odd one out in having strong political beliefs and it’s funny that even now in the political party I’m involved in, in my local area only a handful of active members are from my generation, whilst most are from the older generation and the second largest group are from the younger generation)

        It really wasn’t much of a fighting generation to begin with back at their teenage and young adult years (just compare it to the much more recent Climate movements of the young) and there was a lot of apathy towards the ones amongst them who were (the pinnacle in the US was maybe Occupy Wall Street, which was violently suppressed by Obama - the very same who did the shoving of trillions towards Finance in the first place - and notice how still today so many of my generation think he was a great President).

        I agree with you on the outmanouvered point, though that was a lot easier to do because the will was there for a few, not for the many, so when the few got suppressed the many wouldn’t lift a finger and often even agreed that those “making waves” should be stopped.

  • Dave V
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29 months ago

    Thanks for this post. It’s been entertaining reading.

  • Boozilla
    link
    fedilink
    English
    309 months ago

    Glad the boomers are on the way out. As a Gen X’er, not sure we care enough to take charge.

          • @wjrii@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Millennials seem cool. They called bullshit on a lot of stuff that X just shrugged at and tried to slack our way around. I don’t usually know what Z is saying but they seem to at least have moved in a less overtly toxic direction, and they put weak but real taboos on stuff like bullying that no prior generation did.

            It’s all good. I’m gonna go let myself into the empty house and make a PB&J now.

        • Wytch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          159 months ago

          Watching helplessly for 40 or 50 years while your parents’ generation destroys everything will do that

    • @Rutty@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      139 months ago

      As an aging millennial, I am surprised by how the process of time works.

      Like you spend your life acquiring skills and using your knowledge in an ever expanding cornucopia of experiences.

      Then followed by a gradual decline to be left only with your memories of who you once were. But then you realize you were only a small part of the existence of others, and ultimately the universe. Yep, the thought of faculties diminishing over time is enough to put the one into an extensional crisis.

      • Boozilla
        link
        fedilink
        English
        89 months ago

        Yup. This is a wise time in your life to start your estate planning, medical directives, etc. Find yourself a good lawyer for this. I’m sure the cost varies by location and practice, but mine was only about $1,500 US.

  • @Rookwood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    21
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Gen X is too small to matter. Millennials are stepping up and will compete with Boomers for a little while until they finally take over. Thing about Millennials though is that it is a very K shaped generation. About half have had decent success and are conservative/liberal and the other half have been absolutely crushed so it’s kind of a mixed bag and as long as the Boomers have any influence not much is likely to change. GenZ is bigger than Millennials though and should be right behind them. They are very different and much more politically radical, on both the left and right. Things are likely to change with them.

    • @ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      59 months ago

      There’s apparently 65.2 million Gen Xers vs 75 million millenials. Smaller, but “too small to matter” seems like a really weird take.

      • Omega
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I’m worried about the Alphas and younger Zs who weren’t paying attention until after Covid. The news doesn’t talk about Trump’s laundry list of controversies or extremism. They just yell about the economy and the border and point at Biden.

        As usual, they make rationalists look alarmist.

    • @Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -39 months ago

      Spoken just like the boomers. Heads up your own asses just like them.

      65 million X compared to 72 millennial. Wow. Carry on.

      Whatever.

    • @Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      229 months ago

      One thing I’m looking forward to with millennial leadership is just people that finally fully understand the power of the internet, big data and what truly distinguishes the information age. If you didn’t grow up with it, it’s hard to grapple with just how much it truly upended … fucking everything. They mostly still don’t understand that a computer can basically read their mind now, just through indirect data gathering and comparing them to all of the other people. We all get that at a more intuitive level, we’ve spent too long around these algorithms and seas of semi-anonymous others.

      Of course we’ll be in some quantum AI room-temp-superconductor age by then, so, y’know how it goes. But we should at least have a better handle on the information age problems, so that’ll be nice.

      • @Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        79 months ago

        But we should at least have a better handle on the information age problems, so that’ll be nice.

        Technology keeps creating new problems. The problems don’t stay still and wait to be fixed.