Last week, I turned on my PC, installed a Windows update, and rebooted to find Microsoft Edge automatically open with the Chrome tabs I was working on before the update. I don’t use Microsoft Edge regularly, and I have Google Chrome set as my default browser. Bleary-eyed at 9AM, it took me a moment to realize that Microsoft Edge had simply taken over where I’d left off in Chrome. I couldn’t believe my eyes.

  • @Xcf456@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    Pretty crazy to think they got broken up in the late 90s/early 2000s for simply including IE in a fresh Windows install (im probably over simplifying but still). Yet these days they’re pulling this kind of shit

    • Norah (pup/it/she)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You aren’t really over simplifying that much. IE was installed, but on first launch it loaded a website called BrowserChoice.eu where you could pick a different browser to install. It would change the default browser setting and remove IE shortcuts. The order of the browser’s was randomised similar to the way an election ballot usually is.

      Microsoft set it up to comply with an EU decision in 2010, only on devices sold in the EU. However, it was only required until December 2014, so Microsoft quietly discontinued it in an update. The functionality was never included in Edge.

      Edit: the 90s-00s anti-trust stuff with Microsoft and IE wasn’t just about IE being the default in Windows. It was also because they forced Apple to include it on Mac OS as the default, otherwise they’d stop developing Office for Mac. They also stipulated that Apple couldn’t develop their own competing browser and Safari wasn’t born until later.

      Ironic that Apple went on to do the same thing with Safari, and more importantly the WebKit engine, on iOS. Plus now trying to force its competitors to either continue using Webkit, or maintain two seperate versions of their apps. One for within the EU and one for everywhere else

  • Jaysyn
    link
    fedilink
    461 year ago

    No one who enjoys the Internet should be using Chrome for anything.

    • Hyperreality
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I use it for gmail and related google apps, nothing else.

      Honestly works for me. Chrome for emails and stuff. No history, full privacy mode firefox for everything else. That includes youtube and links in emails.

      Google thinks all I ever do is check my emails.

  • raccoona_nongrata
    link
    fedilink
    2401 year ago

    Uninstall Edge with admin CMD prompt:

    1. cd %PROGRAMFILES(X86)%\Microsoft\Edge\Application\xxx\Installer

    (Change the xxx to the version of your edge)

    1. setup.exe --uninstall --system-level --verbose-logging --force-uninstall

    And then uninstall Chrome and use FF instead.

    • @Zworf@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      38
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And do this every time the system gets a major update because it puts all the crapware right back 🫣

      • @Toribor@corndog.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve started using Ansible to apply windows settings and manage packages because of this. It’s a bit of work to setup the playbooks but I just run it occasionally on my windows hosts to keep Microsoft from reverting settings or reinstalling junk.

      • @dubyakay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        161 year ago

        I’ve been a lifelong windows user (well and DOS and whatever cartridge I used with the C64/C128) but I think it’s just time to uninstall the OS instead.

        • Big P
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          I would love to ditch windows but Linux desktop just isn’t ready

          • @dubyakay@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            It looks ready to me. Just need to figure out equivalents in software, many which I’m sure are similar or better.

            • Big P
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              It’s not just that, I had unending problems when I tried last and most of the help I received online was incredibly combative (“you shouldn’t want to do that”) or just asking me to switch distro and start again, of course the distro recommended was different each time

              • @dubyakay@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Which distro did you try last time? Just for future reference.

                I’ve installed Linux mint for a family member on a netbook back in 2008, and it worked splendid ootb. At least for surfing the web, watching streams and movies and playing Solitaire or something. But can’t expect too much from a netbook.

                • Big P
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Mint. Had problems with device drivers, with things I used for my job not having proper software support. With having to edit config based on a dream and a whole lot of guesswork just to make some peripherals work. Being told that a config setting I use on windows need not exist on Linux because I can just buy different hardware…

          • @flashgnash@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            I think gnome at least is there now

            Not much you can’t do from a gui, it works pretty reliably

            Most people myself included use commandline package managers though, so I’m not sure what state graphical interfaces on them are in right now

          • verdare [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            8
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Depends on your needs. For a lot of users, I think the current Linux desktop experience is sufficient. If you have more specific needs, I can see why you’d stick with Windows.

            • @Moira_Mayhem@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              91 year ago

              I have tried to switch my daily driver to linux for more than 15 years now, Linux desktop just isn’t ready.

              Full disclosure: I am an IT admin with near 3 decades of experience, including administrating linux servers, so this isn’t a skill gap.

              • Aniki 🌱🌿
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                That’s hilarious. I was a full time IT admin earlier in my career and still have run Linux full time for well over a decade now. For anything proprietary, i have a qemu image.

                Of course, now I’m a DevOps admin so I get play with linux all day, for $$$! Hundreds of servers of all distros! Ubuntu, Cent, RHEL, Alpine containers… My big task this year is to get off Docker/Mesos and into OCI/Kubernettes. It’s going to be an incredible project.

              • Weird, I switched my daily driver in December 2022 over to Mint (likewise I’ve been using Linux for various things since '08, so not a noob) and it’s been pretty damn solid since then, including upgrades from Mint 20 to 21 and all of the Mint 21 point releases.

                • Big P
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Mint was the last one I tried and it was awful, really buggy and poor UX

                • @Moira_Mayhem@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  I admit that Mint is the distro I got the furthest with, several weeks in I just stopped being able to do full screen 3d. I spent a month and a half on forums trying to figure it out including 2 clean installs and couldn’t get anywhere.

                  I even did board level diagnostics on my video card.

                  Just gave up and went back to windows, never had an issue there and still don’t.

                  I’ll use linux for remote servers or fun little house gadgets, but as much as I hate windows, (and I hate windows with the seething glowing magma aged bitterness of someone who has had to support it since WIndows 3.11.

                  I would LOVE to ditch it, especially now, but until I can get a clean install to doing what I need to do in under a day, I can’t advocate linux.

              • arglebargle
                link
                fedilink
                English
                5
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I have tried to switch my daily driver to linux for more than 15 years now, Linux desktop just isn’t ready.

                Something isn’t adding up here. I switched to mostly Linux around 2003. By 2005 it was all Linux unless I got paid for it. My wife has been only Linux since then and she doesn’t really know how to use a computer and doesn’t want to. Linux just works for her.

                I do all my work from a Linux desktop and two Linux laptops. Well and a Steamdeck I use as a desktop when traveling. I remote into windows machines when I am using windows for jobs. Sometimes desktops, sometimes Azure virtual desktops, but my local client is always Linux.

                I have an MSDN, I admin Azure instances, SQL servers, Windows Servers, and work on Windows desktops. Over the last two to three years it has been the windows machines that are the most annoying and troublesome. Linux is just easy and just works.

                The Linux desktop is ready. Has been ready. Something is going on with your situation. Could be breaking old habits, could be hardware. I don’t know. But saying Linux is to blame here is ridiculous.

                • @1993_toyota_camry@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Nearly identical story here, and I agree.

                  Habits and hardware are definitely the big ones to overcome. I still remember how absolutely lost I felt the first couple times I tried installing slackware in the 90s. I could install/set up windows in my sleep. But then slackware dropped to an unfamiliar command prompt, I can’t dir, there isn’t even a C drive, and now I’m expected to configure something called xfree86. Luckily I wasn’t told to use vi or I’d be stuck there to this day.

                  New users aren’t thrown into the deep end quite like that anymore, but it’s still a big change for a windows power user. So much of what you learned is not applicable or just the wrong way to do things. Mac users and Windows non-power-users seem to have a much easier time accepting the changes.

                  It’s definitely not for everyone (is any OS?) but it’s been ‘ready’ as a desktop OS for me since Mandrake 8 in ~2001. That’s about when I ditched windows 2000 and haven’t looked back.

                • Big P
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  You think it’s impossible that Windows, an operating system with whole teams of people paid well to work on design and UX could be easier to use than Linux desktop which is primarily people working in their spare time?

            • Big P
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              The amount of issues I had last time I tried says otherwise

      • @wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        271 year ago

        Alternatively, buy or 🏴‍☠️KMSpico🏴‍☠️ yourself a pro license, and use group policy so it’s one and done. Microsoft has built in tools for almost all of this that don’t get rolled over by updates.


        Getting tired of people claiming that it’s impossible to decrap Windows.

        Obtuse? Sure! Features that shouldn’t be hidden behind an upgraded license? Hell fucking yes!

        Impossible? Fuck no, hell no.

        Learning basic Windows admin stuff, especially just the debloating/configuration things, is comparable in difficulty to switching to Linux.

        Don’t get me wrong, I love Linux and less reliance on Microsoft is awesome, but 90% of complaints about Windows come from people who don’t know how to configure it, how to use the tools Microsoft offers to decrap it, and how to make it work for them. They’ll hit similar problems with most Linux distros as soon as you go deeper than basic “office suite and web browser” usage.

          • @Zworf@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            Well yes but GPOs overrule registry settings (if a user or the OS flips a registry setting, the GPO will switch it back on the next reboot).

          • voxel
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            you don’t need to write protect them, except options related to ms defender. (which can be removed as “malware” by the defender)
            they won’t get reset.

        • Norah (pup/it/she)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          If you’ve got a few windows machines on your network and some sysadmin skills, you can run a Zentyal server to set up the GPOs. Syncs across your machines, and you can add a new one at any time that will also get de-shittified instantly.

        • ☂️-
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          if its comparable in difficulty, why not just switch to a system that does what you want on the first place?

        • RachelRodent
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          I think, my reason for switching stemmed from me getting bored if decrapifying windows and wanting to hsebsomething awesome to begin with

        • voxel
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          you should use MAS instead of Pico
          https://massgrave.dev
          also, gpos are just templates for the registry, you can just look them up and apply manually (ehich is actually faster than finding anything in the official gpo editor), unless you’re a sysadmin and managing a whole fleet of machines (this is what gpo editor was actually made for) there’s no real need for it.

        • @Zworf@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m not saying it’s impossible. I’m just saying I shouldn’t have to decrap a piece of software I actually paid for. Over and over. Also, whenever they introduce some new crap it usually comes with new GPOs that also have to be enabled to remove it again. It’s like whack-a-mole.

          Obtuse? Sure! Features that shouldn’t be hidden behind an upgraded license? Hell fucking yes!

          This is what I was saying really. This crap should never have been there in the first place as it’s consumer-hostile.

          Impossible? Fuck no, hell no.

          I never said this :) I said it was annoying having to do it every time. Yeah I have pro. And I know what GPOs are. But really, you can’t expect an average consumer to do this. Also, it’s less work to just change things back manually every time than to figure all the GPOs needed. It’s really just super annoying that it happens in the first place. I expect software I buy to be made to help me, not work against me.

          And I never mentioned Linux in my post even though I use it myself. I know this is not a suitable alternative for the majority.

              • voxel
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                fuck gentoo, spending an entire week compiling shit is not something i want to do
                I’d rather stick with arch or fedora

                • @1993_toyota_camry@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  As a gentoo user, I’m always confused when people think gentoo is about multi-day compiles. Rebuilding the whole system takes a few hours (not that I ever need to do that), and binary packages are available for the big stuff if you want it. It’s basically just arch with more configuration options.

                  Not insisting you or anyone should run it, but it’s not as ridiculous as people seem to think.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      No. Install Linux and be done with the Microsoft bullshit forever

    • voxel
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      this is borked in win11, and got borked in win10 a month ago.
      my secondary win10 machine that had been edge-free for at least 4 years, just got edge back and since it was also disabled by policy, throws an error on every boot, since apparently that piece of crap tries to autostart for whatever reason (even if autostart option is disabled, it just starts in background, does something and closes a few minutes later)

    • 🌘 Umbra Temporis 🌒
      link
      fedilink
      201 year ago

      Just want to mention Floorp, based on FF but with loads of additional options & appearance settings, also lightning-fast.

      • nevernevermore
        link
        fedilink
        121 year ago

        Just want to mention Librewolf which is also FF based and has no telemetry out of the box, as well or ublock origin installed by default.

        • Snot Flickerman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          171 year ago

          Partially because we need stable forks for if/when Mozilla bites the dirt.

          • z3rOR0ne
            link
            fedilink
            81 year ago

            These are all great. I use Librewolf and Mull on the regular. That said, I doubt any of these would be able to take up the mantle that Mozilla holds. The amount of resources and manpower needed to maintain and produce a modern browser that isn’t a fork is immense.

            Not to knock the devs who maintain these forks, but my guess is the majority of the work comes down to the devs at Mozilla. And if they fall, it’s likely these forks will as well, or at least will become an out of date mess.

  • @wick@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    261 year ago

    That’s hilarious. Why would you use chrome instead of edge though? At least with edge you cut out google, with chrome you give data to both.

    • @Senal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      301 year ago

      I’m having trouble parsing this so i might be commenting on something that isn’t there.

      Current edge is a chrome re-skin with some addons, I’d put good money on it not being google free.

      If you care about data going to nefarious places you probably shouldn’t be using either.

      • @flashgnash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        If you’re using windows you’re already giving Microsoft data so may as well

        Edge uses chromium not chrome, I would hazard a guess there’s much less data harvesting going on in base chromium given it’s open source and people can see exactly what they collect

        • @Senal@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          If you’re using windows you’re already giving Microsoft data so may as well

          While technically correct, to me this sounds like “You haven’t managed to stop some of the tracking, why not just give them everything?” which is personally not my approach.

          Not to say that my approach isn’t effort and is even effective, but I’d much rather limit the damage in the ways i can rather than give up entirely. I can see why someone wouldn’t want to put in that kind of effort though and i don’t fault them for it.

          Edge uses chromium not chrome, I would hazard a guess there’s much less data harvesting going on in base chromium given it’s open source and people can see exactly what they collect

          Open source yes, but not necessarily free from data-harvesting.

          The fact that un-googled chromium (and others like it) exist implies that straight up chromium being open source isn’t a guarantee they aren’t doing consumer-hostile shit anyway.

          Though, yes, it’s almost certainly less than full-fat chrome.

          • @flashgnash@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            I don’t think there’s any data Microsoft can get through you using edge that they can’t also get just by controlling your OS

            Nothing at all stopping them from reading data from other browsers, as has been demonstrated by the whole stealing chrome tabs thing

            There are valid reasons to use windows and if you’ve gotta use it anyway they’ve already got your data from the start

            • @Senal@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I don’t think there’s any data Microsoft can get through you using edge that they can’t also get just by controlling your OS

              I’d put mid-level money on that not being true. There are a lot of things going on in a browser, a lot of which aren’t particularly easy to access from the outside.

              Not to say it isn’t possible.

              There are valid reasons to use windows and if you’ve gotta use it anyway they’ve already got your data from the start

              To a degree yes, but assuming they aren’t pulling nefarious shit in the background, there are in theory many things you can turn off or somewhat neutralise using the options in the OS to reduce the level of data collection.

              They are slowly removing those options but they still exist for now.

              Again, i fully understand people not wanting to go to the trouble to achieve a goal they don’t care about, but that isn’t the same as there being nothing you can do if you wish to.

        • @Senal@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          There shouldn’t be any of the Googled parts of Chrome in Edge, just as there aren’t any Googled parts of Chrome in stock Chromium.

          There are at the very least googled parts of chromium in it though : https://github.com/ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium

          Unless google have significantly changed the way they package and build chromium recently there are still google web service dependencies and i believe binary blobs (though they may have changed the closed source blob policy iirc)

          Of course, you are now giving your data to Microsoft instead of Google, which isn’t really a win or a lose. If you’re not paying for the software, you’re either using FOSS, or the software is paid for by selling access to you and your computer.

          Indeed

  • fmstrat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    Everyone in this thread is complaining about Chrome. They should be complaining about MS.

    • 4dpuzzle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Chrome’s singular purpose of existence is to give Google an avenue to vacuum up user data - both directly and through corruption of the web standards. Edge doing this crap is merely like giving a pig a clown hat. Fuck em both.

  • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    i havent seen windows being mentioned in my feed for a while but this is pretty funny.

    “uh, i am using a closed system made by fellas known to love money and have no respect for anyone and now to my suprise yet another thing they did is not what i want.”

    …and it is 2024.

  • Aniki 🌱🌿
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 year ago

    LOL This is what happens when you run closed source garbage. Nothing is in your control.

  • 4dpuzzle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    I thought I had heard the worst of it. But it’s their platform. They keep inventing new ways to screw their customers.

    • V ‎ ‎
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      Funny how the EU council considers iOS to be a big problem but not Microsoft’s behavior around Edge. Both need to be corrected, but only one has seen any action - and it ain’t Microsoft.

      • Lvxferre [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Accordingly to The Verge, “EU regulators have “tentatively concluded” that Bing and Edge aren’t dominant enough for the DMA regulations”.

        I agree that both need to be corrected though. The issue is Microsoft’s behaviour being unacceptable. It also creates a nasty situation, where other corporations might argue “you allowed Microsoft to do it, so allow us too, otherwise you’re being unfair.”

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s Chromium!

      I honestly do suspect the fact that they’re both Chromium based is part of why this is possible.

        • 🌘 Umbra Temporis 🌒
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Heavily doubt it. Google wants people using Chrome, not anything else Chromium-based. Otherwise they’d also have no issue with Brave, Vivaldi, Opera (GX) etc.

          It’s like cars, VW, BMW, Renault, Peugeot etc will all compete even though they all (mostly) use I4 engines.

      • 🌘 Umbra Temporis 🌒
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I can’t imagine it be too difficult to extract the open URLs, end chrome and launch Edge with the appropriate arguments.

        But if it carried over cookies too, that’s when I would see the chromium common-ground help out.

  • @Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    That’s horrible. Also normal.

    And sad because none of those two things should even exist, much less dominate the market.

    • 4dpuzzle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      That last statement is exactly why I blame its users. They are complicit in this market abuse.

      • @Moonrise2473@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Except a PC from 2008 can still run the latest windows 10 version without any real issues (an i7 940 from that time is roughly equivalent in perfomance to a brand new Celeron g5900) while a Mac from 2008 became e-waste years ago when Apple discontinued MacOS and workarounds become harder and harder with each yearly os update. And too many Mac developers target the latest MacOS versions so if you don’t update you can’t run latest apps.

        “But you can run Linux on a Mac” yeah thanks to the proprietary shit, if I run Debian on my old iMac I get only a black screen (other distros are running ok though, not all of them are without issues)

            • 4dpuzzle
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Exactly! Apple is just a different type of abuser. This is like saying “My previous spouse was very abusive. So I chose to marry another abusive person”.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    561 year ago

    And again, install Linux and be done with this shit. Fuck Windows, fuck everything about Microsoft, don’t use their crap

    • 4dpuzzle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      Having switched Linux for over two decades now, I find the current state of Windows to be extremely weird. Why do people tolerate such abuse? Is it that the gradual degradation conditioned people to accept it? Sort of like the proverbial frog in the boiling water?

      • @gerryflap@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Personally I still use Windows for gaming and some other programs that work better under Windows. I’ve tried to switch, but it was just a bit too unstable to depend on for me. For me none of this shit has happened tho. No forced Cortana, no sudden Candy Crush install, no Edge fucking with my browsing. I’d rather switch to Linux full time instead of dual booting, because M$ is still pulling all these moves on others, but sometimes convenience does win.

      • @blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        I first tried Linux around two decades ago, and it felt clunky to me - so I didn’t stick with it. I tried again around one decade ago; and it was a lot better, but I still didn’t quite have enough reason to keep using it yet. … But now, finally, I tried again several months ago - and I’m definitely sticking with it. I’m currently using Mint.

        There are still some thing that I think are worse in Mint compared to Windows. But there is a lot of stuff that’s much better. It’s more than enough that I don’t expect to ever switch back to Windows again. The main thing is avoiding all the anti-features of Windows, such as the constant nagging to switch to Edge or activate their search bar; and the ads & other cruft in the start menu; and the constant little popups and ‘reminders’ about new stuff; and the lack of control in when updates are installed; and the ubiquitous harvesting of personal information, including ‘telemetry’ of which apps you run and when.

        For me, one of the last straws was when I clicked on a help link from Windows settings, and it automatically opened in Edge, and Edge then automatically imported my browsing history and bookmarks from Firefox and automatically uploaded it to my Microsoft account. I was horrified that it would do something like that without any interaction whatsoever. I didn’t even think Edge had access to my Microsoft account until then, because I deliberately avoid using one to sign in, or for any other reason - the only reason it exists is because I used OneNote. I wanted the account to be isolated to just the app I used it for; not to automatically be grabbed by the whole OS and then used to collect my browsing history.

        So yeah. I’d spent years of maintaining an ever-growing list of little system tweaks that I used to keep as junk off Windows as possible. But I’ve had enough. It’s too much. It’s not even close to being worth it. Linux has some minor problems, and some things take a bit of getting use to. But at least it isn’t systematically hostile.

        • 4dpuzzle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          I made that jump two decades ago. My last straw was the fact that Windows was making numerous connections online without my permission or even knowledge. One thing I can tell you though - Microsoft makes sure that you don’t regret the decision to switch. I know that some problems in Linux can be frustrating - especially driver-related issues. But you eventually learn to solve them - a solution if often just a web search away. But the freedom you get in exchange is priceless. So, hang in there and your persistence will be rewarded.