• appel
    link
    fedilink
    781 year ago

    This stuff just makes my blood boil. Those 3 assholes on the parole board are complete sociopaths. There’s absolutely no justice here.

    • @stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      20
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s actually a requirement I think.

      In WA during lockdown, they requested compassionate release of someone who was paralyzed on half his body and confined to a chair. The DOC decided that he was a threat to society and needed to be kept in the COVID greenhouse.

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well, political positions, yes. But there are tons of government employees around the country that are just normal people working at a regulatory agency. The overwhelming majority of them. They’re just doing their job.

        At least for now. SCOTUS is very close to changing that.

  • FlavoredButtHair
    link
    fedilink
    English
    251 year ago

    Remember come election time who is responsible for this. Just like actions, elections have consequences.

  • vortic
    link
    fedilink
    1231 year ago

    I don’t understand how 40 years of prison for a non-violent crime isn’t considered to be both “cruel” and “unusual”. It is objectively cruel. I certainly hope that it is also unusual. I certainly hope that there aren’t many more like him, imprisoned for decades for what amounts to personal-use levels of pot. 5.5 lbs of pot when you include the stem and roots isn’t that much and certainly sounds like a personal supply to me.

    • @marxistsynths19@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      661 year ago

      These people are kept in jail to be used in labor. It’s not about being cruel. It’s about making money in the cheapest way possible. Since Alabama is a hellhole with no workforce they turn to modern day slavery.

      • @buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        Yeah, when you read the article you see that the parole board has stopped issuing paroles almost entirely in the last couple of years. This is 100% about manufacturing cheap labor and keeping the oligarchy running smoothly.

      • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        24
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Oh it’s both. It’s definitely both, the cruelty and the slave labor, which is cruel in and of itself as well.

    • @JustMy2c@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      181 year ago

      It is the most cruel people in the world that hide behind a law book and the pretense of being fair and worse even: past cases.

      But since you first have to study for a decade, then kiss ass for a decade or two before even beginning to qualify for ‘JUDGE’ it is not more as normal you will have lost ALL BONDS WITH REGULAR SOCIETY.

      If you think 15$+tax+tip is fine for a glass of wine with lunch on a daily basis; you are NOTTTTTTT qualified to speak for the benefit of society : in contrary!

      • @BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah I think you’re mistaking what a Judges role is. It is merely to uphold the law. The problem in the US is that the role is so politicised that the idea they are legal experts rather than representatives of parties is being lost. They should be representative of society to an extent but ultimately the main qualification is legal experience.

        The issue is the law itself and that comes back to the elected politicians in Alabama. It’s a problem of one party rule, and first past the post electoral system plus gerrymandering which means a stagnant political system dominated by one segment of society. The US increasingly looks like a it’s just a large collection of failed democracies.

        You don’t specifically need representative judges. You need electoral reform so you have an actual representative democracy, and everything else comes from that.

        • @JustMy2c@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          The MAKING of the law favors the establishment. I say use the guillotine first, then new laws. Slave master still a slave master now, only the slaves believe they’re free

        • @JustMy2c@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          I’m stating it’s the WRONG ROLE law should NOT be upheld in the same way for poor and rich. For uneducated and the wise.

          IT SHOULD NOT BE THE SAME favoring the poor and weak.

          HOWEVER IT FAVORS THE EXACT OPOSITE.

          • @pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            It shouldn’t favor anybody.

            If anything, it goes to show why legal systems are plain and simply bad ideas and why people need to have the ultimate authority to handle business on their own again. That way, at least, it’s fair, for every man is provided for by either victory, ingenuity, or death.

            • vortic
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              Okay, I’m genuinely curious, can you elaborate on what you’re advocating? What time in human history do you think we should return to? Tribalism?

              I don’t think there has ever been a period of time where there wasn’t some form of social organization. Humans are naturally social and tend to create social groups with rules and enforcement mechanisms. Even if we were to start with a blank slate where there were no governments, companies, tribes, or social groups, humans would quickly recreate them because we have evolved to make use of social structures. We are stronger as a group than individually and groups only survive by having rules and methods of enforcement.

              • @pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                You’re not genuinely curious or here in good faith, you’re derisive, vindictive and guilty of every moral failing you’re about to accuse me of having for not thinking the way you do.

                So you do not get the luxury of a debate with me.

                Now I said that legal systems are plain and simply bad ideas, and that sadly is not going to change no matter who does what. It’s just the reality of the situation.

                So move on from this conversation like you would have told me to had I wasted your time arguing with you about it.

                • vortic
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  If I came across as derisive, I didn’t mean to. I was genuinely trying to ask what you meant.

                  I don’t know how it is possible for me to be vindictive when I don’t know you. I don’t want revenge against you. You’ve done nothing to me.

                  I wasn’t going to accuse you of any kind of moral failing and am not sure why you took my response as a personal attack on your moral character.

                  You stated that “legal systems are plain and simply bad ideas” and that “people need to have the ultimate authority to handle business on their own again”. That sounds like you are advocating a return to something that existed in the past where people could act autonomously, without regard for the legal system.

                  I am responding that I don’t think that people have ever had the “ultimate authority to handle business on their own” and am wondering if you can give an explanation of what you are suggesting. I’m arguing that, when presented with anarchy, humans will always tend to create social structures and legal systems.

        • @Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          Judges are “supposed to be” impartial, not representative. That’s one of our many problems. They shouldn’t be conservative or liberal, they should be judges, but people don’t seem to be capable of impartiality, especially ones with any degree of power. Just like men who claim to want to lead really wish to rule. Those who would judge really just want to decide.

    • @Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Or, you know, you could vote Democrats into a super majority, and we could legally remove all the insanely corrupt politicians and judges, and do things like federally legalize weed and pardon non violent weed convictions.

  • roguetrick
    link
    fedilink
    59
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That law provides several different levels of trafficking, and Hotchkiss was convicted under the lowest level – having between 2.2 lbs and 100lbs. That weight includes all parts of the plant, root and stem and all.

    40 years, jesus fucking CHRIST.

  • FlashMobOfOne
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    Remember these headlines any time someone makes excuses for the lack of action by the Federal Government, even when we give Democrats Congress and the presidency.

      • FlashMobOfOne
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        Totally.

        Just like the Federal Government did nothing about alcohol prohibition.

        • @neptune@dmv.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          You see, this is kind of the reverse. The federal govt could blackmail states into legalization but it’s going to be hard to make states adjust their own prior convictions. Apples and oranges.

          • FlashMobOfOne
            link
            fedilink
            -11 year ago

            LOL

            I miss the days when Democrats had balls. FDR had a literal plot on his life and still didn’t bitch out on using his office to make real, substantial change.

            These days people look at things have have been done and still somehow convince themselves better things aren’t possible. That should be the Democrats’ slogan in the race this year.

            • @neptune@dmv.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              While I largely agree with you, I’m not sure a civil war for a 20,000 state level prisoners makes immediate sense

    • @CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      22
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I hope you don’t consider the 50-50 split Senate to be one of the times we “gave Democrats Congress and the presidency”. Do you think they were going to find 10 Republicans and overcome the filibuster for that legislation?

      The last time the Democrats had control that gave them a realistic chance of doing something like this, marijuana legalization didn’t even have majority support in the US. Even among Democrats it was pretty divided.

      The time before that, Bill Clinton was president and was under fire for admitting he had ever tried marijuana in his life, and had to claim he “didn’t inhale”.

      And those were all the times in my life that the Democrats had any sort of majority in Congress and a Dem president.

      You make it sound like there have been these chances over and over. But there isn’t even one single time you can look back at and say “right here, you had all the opportunity in the world and we asked you to do it, and you didn’t do it”.

        • @CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          That’s really all you have to say? Your statement that I responded to strongly suggested at least one, if not multiple, clear opportunities to make major changes to marijuana law that Democrats didn’t take. Are you not interested in the fact that that is not true?

          Your reaction is like if someone pointed out factually wrong statements made by an antivaxxer and the antivaxxer responded with “I guess I shouldn’t try to protect my body”. No, that part is perfectly fine, it’s that you should just use actual facts or you could end up deciding on a course of action that is diametrically opposed to the outcome you want!

          I expect better – from you!

  • @Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    What could the parole board’s justification for denial possibly be? I don’t see any risk from this guy, unless there’s something more nefarious than 2.2 lbm of pot going on.

    • @stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Guarantee that they looked nowhere beyond the actual text of the law and didn’t consider anything else. This is only “it’s illegal because we say it is and we will punish you for not conforming”.

  • SuperDuper
    link
    fedilink
    116
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Life sentence for growing some pot. Meanwhile the Jan 6th insurrectionists are getting maybe 2 years, or if you’re a card carrying proud boy terrorist you might be looking at up to 20 years.

    • Masterblaster
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      i guess we should take justice into our own hands instead of waiting for someone else to do the right thing.

            • @Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              The Jan 6 people made the one critical mistake that a revolutionary must never make: they failed to win. Every other mistake they made was recoverable, but that one damned them.

              • Masterblaster
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                not sure if your comment was meant with sarcasm, but you’re 100% correct. you have to set every other concern aside and understand that you do whatever it takes to win. whatever. it. takes. if you weren’t prepared to do that, you should have never tried in the first place.

                the J6 people were idiots. they thought that there was some magical lever that, if pulled, would grant them their wishes - kinda like some moron sovereign citizen that thinks magic words will get them out of jail or consequences.

                it just doesn’t work like that. you can’t just capture the capitol and think that wins the game. it’s much deeper. the real revolutionaries will fight thousands of unseen battles in clandestine ways using different tools than torches and pitchforks.

    • @Jerb322@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      641 year ago

      Some guy beat someone so bad they need 24hr supervision, and he got 7 years. Cops get of with paid vacation for shooting or running over: dogs, unarmed adults and children, flash bang babies, drunk driving, beating their SO, planting drugs on innocent people. Did I miss anything?

      War on drugs, no, it’s a war on personal freedoms.

      • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        It’s not even just a war on personal freedoms. It’s a war on anyone the people running the system don’t like. The US has been at war with its own citizens longer than I’ve been alive.

        • @stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Well since before it was a country. Remember tar and feathering as a form of political discourse?

      • andrew_bidlaw
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The weird outlier is a recent charge of a guy who assaulted 6 cops and got 5 years. A glitch in the system.

      • @stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        151 year ago

        There are actual recordings from the Nixon Whitehouse where they decided that since they could no longer legally discriminate against people based on race, they’d have to find another way and drugs was it.

  • 2.2 -100lbs is a massive range especially when the weight every part of the plant. That’s a difference of growing enough for a month to smoke and supplying the neighborhood. Two massively different goals.